NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques

被引:39
|
作者
De Munck, Jan
Ermis, R. Banu
Koshiro, Kenichi
Inoue, Satoshi
Ikeda, Takatsumi
Sano, Hidehiko
Van Landuyt, Kirsten L.
Van Meerbeek, Bart
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Sch Dent Oral Pathol & Maxillofacial Surg, Dept Conservat Dent, Leuven BIOMAT Res Cluster, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Hlth Sci, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608586, Japan
[3] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Isparta, Turkey
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
adhesion; dental adhesive; NaOCl; enamel; dentin;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2006.05.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Phase-separation within HEMA-free all-in-one dental adhesives may result in the entrapment of droplets within the adhesive resin. Strongly air-blowing prior to polymerization, can remove most of these droplets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect these droplets may have on the resistance of the adhesive-tooth interface to NaOCl degradation. Methods: The micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) to enamel and dentin was determined when a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive was applied either following a mild or strong air-blowing technique. The bonds were also exposed to an aqueous sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution for 1 h, following a recently introduced methodology to mimic in vivo bond degradation. Results: This study revealed that strong air-blowing of the adhesive only resulted in a significantly higher micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) to dentin, but not to enamel. Likewise, NaOCl only reduced the mu TBS to dentin for both the mild and strong air-blowing technique, but again not the mu TBS to enamel. Failure analysis by SEM clearly revealed that strong air-blowing is less effective in droplet removal when the adhesive was applied in small and narrow class-I cavities, as compared to when it was applied to flat surfaces. Conclusions: NaOCl did preferentially dissolve the hybrid layer at dentin, and more for the mild than for the strong air-blowing technique. A strong air-blowing procedure resulted in a more NaOCl-resistant hybrid layer, so that it can be concluded that a HEMA-free one-step adhesive definitely benefits from a strong air-blowing technique. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 83
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin
    De Munck, Jan
    Arita, Akishi
    Shirai, Kenichi
    Van Landuyt, Kirsten L.
    Coutinho, Eduardo
    Poitevin, Andre
    Peumans, Marleen
    Lambrechts, Paul
    Van Meerbeek, Bart
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 9 (04): : 373 - 379
  • [2] Effect of air-blowing variables on bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to bovine dentin
    Shinkai, Koichi
    Suzuki, Shiro
    Katoh, Yoshiroh
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (04) : 664 - 668
  • [3] Resistance to degradation of resin-dentin bonds using a one-step HEMA-free adhesive
    Monticelli, Francesca
    Osorio, Raquel
    Pisani-Proenca, Jatyr
    Toledano, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2007, 35 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [4] A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year
    Van Landuyt, K. L.
    Peumans, M.
    Fieuws, S.
    De Munck, J.
    Cardoso, M. V.
    Ermis, R. B.
    Lambrechts, P.
    Van Meerbeek, B.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 36 (10) : 847 - 855