Quality of Patient Information on Lipofilling in the Internet

被引:0
|
作者
Spennato, Stefano [1 ]
Zuk, Grzegorz [2 ]
Ghamin, Wahid [2 ]
Raptis, Dimitri A. [3 ]
Palma, Adrian F. [4 ]
机构
[1] AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Dept Plast Reconstruct Esthet & Hand Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] GZO Spital Wetzikon AG, Dept Surg & Traumatol, Wetzikon, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Plast & Hand Surg, Ramistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1097/DSS.0000000000002752
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Patients interested in aesthetic surgery actively search the Internet, a source that contains important but biased information. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on autologous fat grafting available on the Internet. MATERIALS AND METHODS The quantitative and qualitative assessment of websites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (EQIP-36 items). Websites were identified through the most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask, and AOL). RESULTS After duplicate and irrelevant sources were excluded, 608 remaining websites were assessed. Only 164 websites addressed >17 of the 36 items. Scores tended to be higher for academic centers and professional societies than for websites developed by private practitioners. The EQIP score achieved by websites ranged between 0 to 28, with a median value of 14 points. CONCLUSION The quality of patient information on lipofilling available on the Internet is very poor, and research on existing websites reveals substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for sources offering superior quality and unbiased information on lipofilling for patients who intend to undergo this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:E86 / E90
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet
    Engelmann, Johannes
    Fischer, Carmen
    Nkenke, Emeka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (07) : 661 - 665
  • [2] Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
    Zuk, Grzegorz
    Palma, Adrian Fernando
    Eylert, Gertraud
    Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
    Guggenheim, Merlin
    Shafighi, Maziar
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (06)
  • [3] Evaluation of the quality of magnetic resonance patient information on the Internet
    Brown, S
    Harrison, RK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 131 - 131
  • [4] Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Phalloplasty in the Internet
    Karamitros, Georgios A.
    Kitsos, Nikolaos A.
    Sapountzis, Stamatis
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (06) : 1426 - 1434
  • [5] Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Phalloplasty in the Internet
    Georgios A. Karamitros
    Nikolaos A. Kitsos
    Stamatis Sapountzis
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 1426 - 1434
  • [6] MELANOMA PATIENT INFORMATION: ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF INTERNET-BASED INFORMATION RESOURCES
    Scali, E.
    Ingledew, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 59 (01) : 183 - 184
  • [7] Quality analysis of patient information on surgical treatment of haemorrhoids on the internet
    Yeung, T. M.
    D'Souza, N. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2013, 95 (05) : 341 - 344
  • [8] Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet
    Priyanka, Priyanka
    Hadi, Yousaf
    Reynolds, Gorman
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S288 - S289
  • [9] Internet as a tool for patient support groups to provide quality information
    Dziadzio, M
    Fligelstone, K
    Smith, R
    Ensz, S
    Denton, C
    Black, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 : 561 - 561
  • [10] Quality of the patient-oriented information on thyroid cancer in the internet
    Udayanga, Viraj
    Jayarajah, Umesh
    Colonne, Soraj D.
    Seneviratne, Sanjeewa A.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 302 - 307