Reexamination of decoy-state quantum key distribution with biased bases

被引:22
|
作者
Yu, Zong-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yi-Heng [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiang-Bin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Low Dimens Quantum Phys, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Data Commun Sci & Technol Res Inst, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China Hefei, Synerget Innovat Ctr Quantum Informat & Quantum P, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Acad Informat & Commun Technol, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Atom & Mol Nano Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
UNCONDITIONAL SECURITY; CRYPTOGRAPHY; COMMUNICATION; ATTACK; CRYPTOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032307
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In order to improve the key rate of the decoy-state method, we need to jointly study yields of different bases. Given the delicate fact that pulses of the same preparation state can have different counting rates if they are measured in different bases, for example, those vacuum pulses and those single-photon pulses, existing results of decoy-state quantum key distribution using biased bases are actually flawed by assuming that they are equal. We fix this flaw through using the idea that yields of pulses prepared in different bases are the same provided that they are prepared in the same state and also measured in the same basis, for example, those single-photon pulses prepared in different bases but measured in the same basis. Based on this, we present correct formulas for the decoy-state method using biased bases Taking the effects of statistical fluctuations into account, we then numerically study the key rates of different protocols with all parameters being fully optimized Our result confirms the prior conclusion that the decoy-state method using biased bases can have an advantage over the symmetric protocol with unbiased bases. We obtain high key rates of our four-intensity protocol without using any vacuum source.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reexamination of the decoy-state quantum key distribution with an unstable source
    Hu, Jia-Zhong
    Wang, Xiang-Bin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 82 (01):
  • [2] Decoy-state quantum key distribution with biased basis choice
    Zhengchao Wei
    Weilong Wang
    Zhen Zhang
    Ming Gao
    Zhi Ma
    Xiongfeng Ma
    Scientific Reports, 3
  • [3] Decoy-state quantum key distribution with biased basis choice
    Wei, Zhengchao
    Wang, Weilong
    Zhang, Zhen
    Gao, Ming
    Ma, Zhi
    Ma, Xiongfeng
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2013, 3
  • [4] Biased decoy-state reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution
    Zhu, Jianrong
    Zhang, Chunmei
    Wang, Qin
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2017, 71 (12):
  • [5] Biased decoy-state reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution
    Jianrong Zhu
    Chunmei Zhang
    Qin Wang
    The European Physical Journal D, 2017, 71
  • [6] Nonorthogonal decoy-state quantum key distribution
    Li, JB
    Fang, XM
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 23 (04) : 775 - 778
  • [7] Decoy-State Reference-Frame-Independent Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution With Biased Bases
    Zhang, Chun-Mei
    Zhu, Jian-Rong
    Wang, Qin
    JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (20) : 4574 - 4578
  • [8] Experimental passive decoy-state quantum key distribution
    Sun, Qi-Chao
    Wang, Wei-Long
    Liu, Yang
    Zhou, Fei
    Pelc, Jason S.
    Fejer, M. M.
    Peng, Cheng-Zhi
    Chen, Xianfeng
    Ma, Xiongfeng
    Zhang, Qiang
    Pan, Jian-Wei
    LASER PHYSICS LETTERS, 2014, 11 (08)
  • [9] Experimental Passive Decoy-state Quantum Key Distribution
    Sun, Qi-Chao
    Wang, Wei-Long
    Liu, Yang
    Zhou, Fei
    Pelc, Jason S.
    Fejer, M. M.
    Peng, Cheng-Zhi
    Chen, Xian-Feng
    Ma, Xiong-Feng
    Zhang, Qiang
    Pan, Jian-Wei
    2014 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), 2014,
  • [10] Decoy-state quantum key distribution with a leaky source
    Tamaki, Kiyoshi
    Curty, Marcos
    Lucamarini, Marco
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2016, 18