Chemical plant innovative safety investments decision-support methodology

被引:18
|
作者
Reniers, G. L. L. [1 ,2 ]
Audenaert, A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, ARGoSS, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Brussels, Hogesch, Ctr Duurzaam Ondernemen, CEDON, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Artesis Hogesch Antwerpen, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
cost/benefit analysis; optimizing safety investments; prevention costs in the chemical sector;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.007
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This article examines the extent to which investing in safety during the creation of a new chemical installation proves profitable. Method: The authors propose a management supporting cost-benefit model that identifies and evaluates investments in safety within a chemical company. This innovative model differentiates between serious accidents and less serious accidents, thus providing an authentic image of prevention-related costs and benefits. In classic cost-benefit analyses, which do not make such differentiations, only a rudimentary image of potential profitability resulting from investments in safety is obtained. Results: The resulting management conclusions that can be drawn from such classical analyses are of a very limited nature. The proposed model, however, is applied to a real case study and the proposed investments in safety at an appointed chemical installation are weighed against the estimated hypothetical benefits resulting from the preventive measures to be installed at the installation. Conclusion: In the case-study carried out in question, it Would appear that the proposed prevention investments are justified. Impact on industry: Such an economic exercise may be very important to chemical corporations trying to (further) improve their safety investments. (C) 2009 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING INTANGIBLE INVESTMENTS
    KIVIJARVI, H
    TUOMINEN, M
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 25 (1-4) : 353 - 356
  • [2] SAFETY AND DECISION-SUPPORT IN ONCOLOGY
    HAMMOND, P
    HARRIS, AL
    DAS, SK
    WYATT, JC
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1994, 33 (04) : 371 - 381
  • [3] AN INTEGRATED DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM IN A CHINESE CHEMICAL-PLANT
    YANG, DL
    MOU, WQ
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1993, 23 (06) : 93 - 100
  • [4] IRIER: A Decision-Support Model for Optimal Energy Retrofit Investments
    Hosseinian, Seyedmohammadhossein
    Choi, Kunhee
    Bae, Junseo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (09)
  • [5] Portfolio Optimization, a Decision-Support Methodology for Small Budgets
    Deplano, Igor
    Squillero, Giovanni
    Tonda, Alberto
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2016, PT I, 2016, 9597 : 58 - 72
  • [7] A fuzzy decision-support system in road safety planning
    Behnood, Hamid Reza
    Ayati, Esmaeel
    Brijs, Tom
    Neghab, Mohammadali Pirayesh
    Shen, Yongjun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2017, 170 (05) : 305 - 317
  • [8] Development of decision-support system for managing highway safety
    Chassiakos, AP
    Panagolia, C
    Theodorakopoulos, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (05) : 364 - 373
  • [9] A decision-support methodology for performance-based asset management
    Hall, JW
    Le Masurier, JW
    Baker-Langman, E
    Davis, JP
    Taylor, CA
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 21 (01) : 51 - 75
  • [10] Decision-support systems for groundwater protection: innovative tools for resource management
    Kollarits, S
    Kuschnig, G
    Veselic, M
    Pavicic, A
    Soccorso, C
    Aurighi, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2006, 49 (06): : 840 - 848