Plot and small-watershed scale runoff from two reclaimed surface-mined watersheds in Alberta

被引:0
|
作者
Harms, TE [1 ]
Chanasyk, DS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
infiltration; runoff coefficients; flumes; depression storage;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(200005)14:7<1327::AID-HYP63>3.0.CO;2-7
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Infiltration excess overland flow has been identified as the dominant flow pathway in recently reclaimed surface mined watersheds as a result of compaction and sorting during the reclamation procedure. Therefore, there could be a fairly direct relationship between runoff generated from the hillslopes to that measured at the watershed outlet. A 3-year study was initiated in 1993 to determine how well surface runoff at a watershed scale could be predicted from 1-m(2) runoff frames placed on hillslopes in two reclaimed surface-mined watersheds in central Alberta. Runoff from the hillslope frames suggests outlet discharge should be high from the 3.4-ha Sandy Subsoil Watershed and much less for the 9.8-ha West Watershed, but the opposite occurred. Most of the hillslope runoff from the Sandy Subsoil Watershed infiltrated once it reached the channel and depression storage played an insignificant role in determining runoff. In contrast, most of the runoff from the West Watershed originated from rain falling directly on the saturated channel (depression storage) or near-channel saturated areas, rather than the hillslopes. Neither watershed runoff magnitude nor timing could be predicted from the same parameters for hillslope runoff frames for either reclaimed watershed. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1339
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] SMALL MAMMAL RECOLONIZATION OF RECLAIMED COAL SURFACE-MINED LAND IN WYOMING
    HINGTGEN, TM
    CLARK, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1984, 48 (04): : 1255 - 1261
  • [2] GROUNDWATER MONITORING IN 3 SMALL SURFACE-MINED WATERSHEDS OF EASTERN OHIO
    RAZEM, AC
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1983, 3 (01): : 153 - 153
  • [3] Runoff response from two reclaimed watersheds
    Harms, TE
    Chanasyk, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (02): : 289 - 299
  • [4] REPORT ON QUALITY OF WATERSHED AND PLOT DATA FROM THE AGRICULTURAL SURFACE-MINED HYDROLOGY RESEARCH GROUP FORT-COLLINS, COLORADO
    DECOURSEY, DG
    [J]. SCIENCE AND EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION PUBLICATIONS, 1982, ARM (NW-31): : 13 - 19
  • [5] Water quality of surface runoff from grazed fescue grassland watersheds in Alberta
    Mapfumo, E
    Willms, WD
    Chanasyk, DS
    [J]. WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA, 2002, 37 (03): : 543 - 562
  • [6] Plot sizes dependency of runoff and sediment yield estimates from a small watershed
    Sadeghi, S. H. R.
    Seghaleh, M. Bashari
    Rangavar, A. S.
    [J]. CATENA, 2013, 102 : 55 - 61
  • [7] ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFACE RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS IN TEXAS
    RICHARDSON, CW
    PRICE, JD
    BURNETT, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1978, 7 (02) : 189 - 192
  • [8] A method to adapt watershed-scale sediment fingerprinting techniques to small-plot runoff experiments
    Wilson, H.
    Cruse, R.
    Burras, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2011, 66 (05) : 323 - 328
  • [9] Up-scaling surface runoff from plot to catchment scale
    Alaoui, A.
    Spiess, P.
    Beyeler, M.
    Weingartner, R.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 43 (04): : 531 - 546
  • [10] Modeling Pesticide Runoff from Small Watersheds Through Field-Scale Management Practices: Minnesota Watershed Case Study with Chlorpyrifos
    Gali, Rohith K.
    Cryer, Steven A.
    Poletika, Nicholas N.
    Dande, Praveen K.
    [J]. AIR SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 113 - 122