Effect of cetuximab combined with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy in treating locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Pei [1 ]
Liu, Jing [1 ]
Yong, Hui [1 ]
Ma, Jianli [1 ]
Gao, Xiaoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 804 Shengli South St, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2021年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cetuximab; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; concurrent radiochemotherapy; efficacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: The clinical information of 126 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, who were admitted to and treated in our department from September 2013 to May 2016, was collected, and they were randomly divided into two groups: cetuximab combined with IMRT and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy group (Cetuximab group, n=63) and IMRT combined with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy group (Control group, n=63). The clinical efficacy, changes in patients' quality of life and incidence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups, and the tumor progression and survival of the patients were followed up and recorded. Results: The patients in Cetuximab group exhibited substantially higher objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) [90.5% (57/63) and 100%] than those in Control group [71.4% (46/63) and 88.9% (56/63)] (p=0.011 and 0.007). After treatment, the physiological status, social and familial status and emotional status based on the FACT-H&N scale were not statistically significantly different between the two groups of patients, but the patients in Cetuximab group had notably superior functional status, additional items for the head and neck and total scale score to those in Control group (p=0.011, 0.021 and 0.038). Additionally, the main adverse reactions of patient after treatment included myelosuppression, fever, gastrointestinal reactions, acne-like rash, radiodermatitis, oral mucositis, and liver and kidney function impairment, most of which were in grade I-II (p>0.05), and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). According to the log-rank test, the differences in the OS and PFS of patients between the two groups were not statistically significant (p=0.411 and 0.114). Conclusions: Cetuximab combined with IMRT and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy has better clinical short-term efficacy in treating locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and the patients treated have improved quality of life and can tolerate adverse reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of nimotuzumab and PF induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treating locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Gao, Min
    Yuan, Tiejun
    Zhang, Fangxiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2021, 26 (01): : 116 - 123
  • [2] Cetuximab concurrent with IMRT versus cisplatin concurrent with IMRT in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective matched case-control study
    Wu, Xin
    Huang, Jingwen
    Liu, Lei
    Li, Hongmei
    Li, Ping
    Zhang, Jing
    Xie, Li
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (39)
  • [3] IMRT Combined with Concurrent S-1 Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase II Study
    Lv, T.
    Wang, X.
    Wang, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : S199 - S200
  • [4] IMRT combined with concurrent S-1 chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective phase II study
    Lv, Tao
    Wang, Xiaoshen
    Wang, YuJie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [5] IMRT combined with Concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zhong, Qiulu
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Li, Ling
    Qu, Song
    Liang, Zhongguo
    Zeng, Fanyan
    Pan, Xinbin
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (24) : 39683 - 39694
  • [6] Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel and Nedaplatin Followed by Concurrent IMRT and Nedaplatin for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Guan, X.
    Zhu, G.
    Wang, X.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S525 - S526
  • [7] Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with IMRT and Concurrent Cisplatin
    Chen, S.
    Feng, C.
    Meng, Y.
    Lin, Z.
    Yin, P.
    Huang, H.
    Yao, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E388 - E388
  • [8] An Open, Multicenter Clinical Study of Cetuximab Combined With Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Lin, T.
    Zhao, C.
    Gao, L.
    Lang, J. Y.
    Pan, J. J.
    Hu, C. S.
    Jin, F.
    Wang, R. S.
    Xie, C. H.
    Lu, T. X.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S561 - S561
  • [9] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone on locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Liu, H.
    Ding, X. R.
    Song, Y. Q.
    Jiang, C.
    Zhong, X. M.
    Hui, H. X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2020, 34 (06): : 2115 - 2119
  • [10] Induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cetuximab for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Ho, G. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)