Paper, E-mail, or Both? Effects of Contact Mode on Participation in a Web Survey of Establishments

被引:14
|
作者
Sakshaug, Joseph W. [1 ,2 ]
Vicari, Basha [1 ]
Couper, Mick P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Employment Res, IAB, Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Univ Michigan, Survey Res Ctr, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
data quality; invitation design; nonresponse bias; response rate; survey costs; RESPONSE RATES; INCENTIVES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1177/0894439318805160
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Identifying strategies that maximize participation rates in population-based web surveys is of critical interest to survey researchers. While much of this interest has focused on surveys of persons and households, there is a growing interest in surveys of establishments. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence on strategies for optimizing participation rates in web surveys of establishments. To address this research gap, we conducted a contact mode experiment in which establishments selected to participate in a web survey were randomized to receive the survey invitation with login details and subsequent reminder using a fully crossed sequence of paper and e-mail contacts. We find that a paper invitation followed by a paper reminder achieves the highest response rate and smallest aggregate nonresponse bias across all-possible paper/e-mail contact sequences, but a close runner-up was the e-mail invitation and paper reminder sequence which achieved a similarly high response rate and low aggregate nonresponse bias at about half the per-respondent cost. Following up undeliverable e-mail invitations with supplementary paper contacts yielded further reductions in nonresponse bias and costs. Finally, for establishments without an available e-mail address, we show that enclosing an e-mail address request form with a prenotification letter is not effective from a response rate, nonresponse bias, and cost perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 765
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of personal salutations in e-mail invitations to participate in a web survey
    Heerwegh, D
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (04) : 588 - 598
  • [2] Contact Strategies to Improve Participation via the Web in a Mixed-Mode Mail and Web Survey
    Holmberg, Anders
    Lorenc, Boris
    Werner, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2010, 26 (03) : 465 - 480
  • [3] E-survey (surveys based on e-mail & web)
    Kalantari, H. D.
    Kalantari, E. D.
    Maleki, S.
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (WCIT-2010), 2011, 3
  • [4] Combining Mail and E-Mail Contacts to Facilitate Participation in Mixed-Mode Surveys
    Israel, Glenn D.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2013, 31 (03) : 346 - 358
  • [5] Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/Web
    Converse, Patrick D.
    Wolfe, Edward W.
    Huang, Xiaoting
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2008, 29 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [6] IS E-MAIL SURVEY OBSOLETE
    Soran, Atilla
    Polat, A. Veysel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2011, 7 (02): : 45 - 45
  • [7] INFORMATION DELIVERY - PAPER AND E-MAIL
    HAWKINS, DT
    [J]. ONLINE, 1990, 14 (02): : 100 - 103
  • [8] The Web and e-mail in science communication
    Dumlao, R
    Duke, S
    [J]. SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2003, 24 (03) : 283 - 308
  • [9] E-mail subject lines and their effect on web survey viewing and response
    Porter, SR
    Whitcomb, ME
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2005, 23 (03) : 380 - 387
  • [10] The Effect of Alternative E-mail Contact Timing Strategies on Response Rates in a Self-administered Web Survey
    Lewis, Taylor
    Hess, Karl
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2017, 29 (04) : 351 - 364