Propofol sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis as an alternative to midazolam to avoid acute deterioration of minimal encephalopathy: A randomized, controlled study

被引:56
|
作者
Riphaus, Andrea [1 ]
Lechowicz, Izabela [1 ]
Frenz, Markus B. [1 ]
Wehrmann, Till [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Siloah, Dept Internal Med Gastroenterol & Intervent Endos, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Liver cirrhosis; midazolam; minimal encephalopathy; propofol; upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; SUBCLINICAL HEPATIC-ENCEPHALOPATHY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL; REGISTERED NURSES; ROUTINE ERCP; RISK; ANESTHESIA; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; PHARMACOKINETICS; COLONOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1080/00365520903194591
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy exacerbates minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in patients with liver cirrhosis, therefore an alternative drug regimen for these patients is warranted. The aim of this randomized, controlled study was to assess whether the use of the short-acting propofol as a sedative for GI endoscopy could prevent the exacerbation of minimal HE in patients with liver cirrhosis. Material and methods. The study comprised patients with liver cirrhosis without clinical HE who had undergone upper GI endoscopy for therapeutic purposes (intended variceal band ligation). Sixty patients were randomly assigned into two groups to receive propofol (n = 40) or midazolam (n = 20) for upper GI endoscopy. The study groups were matched for age, gender and Child-Pugh score. All patients completed number connecting tests (NCTs), as well as a porto-systemic encephalopathy (PSE) syndrome test before and at 2 h after completion of the endoscopic procedure. Time needed to fulfill the tests was documented. Baseline results of the psychomotor test batteries were compared with the post-interventional evaluations. Data were also compared with the results of a healthy control group (n = 20) that did not undergo endoscopic sedation. Recovery time and quality (score system) were evaluated. Results. The differences in the NCT times before and after sedation (median delta NCT, midazolam group, 11 s (95% CI, -1.2 to 16.1 s) versus the propofol group, -9.5 s (95% CI, -15.7 to -4.6 s), p = 0.002) and in the PSE scores ( median delta PSE, midazolam group, -1 ( 95% CI, -1.5 to 0.2) versus the propofol group, 1 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.5), p = 0.0009) differed significantly between the two groups. In addition, the recovery time and quality in patients receiving propofol were significantly improved compared with in the midazolam group (7.8 +/- 2.9 min versus 18.4 +/- 6.7 min, 6.1 +/- 1.1 versus 8.2 +/- 1.3, both p<0.001). Conclusions. The study demonstrates that propofol sedation for upper GI endoscopy does not cause acute deterioration of minimal hepatic encephalopathy and is associated with improved recovery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Propofol should be recommended for these patients as an alternative to midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:1244 / 1251
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM
    CARLSSON, U
    GRATTIDGE, P
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 27 (03) : 240 - 243
  • [2] SEDATION WITH PROPOFOL BUT NOT MIDAZOLAM FOR UPPER ENDOSCOPY DOES NOT AGGRAVATE SUB CLINICAL HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY IN PATIENTS WITH COMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS
    Alexandrov, Olga
    Kamayse, Iad
    Mysh, Vladimire
    Dabbah, Kamal
    Djibre, Agness
    Assy, Nimer
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 50 (04) : 435A - 436A
  • [3] Safety of balanced propofol and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for sedation in cirrhotic patients
    Alam, Laima
    Khattak, Mohammad Asif
    Alam, Mafaza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 71 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [4] Sedation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a randomized controlled study compared propofol plus fentanyl to diazepam plus fentanyl
    Zheng, F. P.
    Li, J. Y.
    Tao, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 56 - 57
  • [5] Safety of propofol/midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with co-morbidities
    Chen, Xiong
    Zhou, Shouhong
    Liu, Rui
    Xu, Canxia
    Guo, Qin
    Xiao, Dinghua
    Huang, Lihua
    Wang, Fen
    Tang, Wuliang
    Shen, Shourong
    Jiang, Xiwang
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (11): : 12514 - 12522
  • [6] The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam
    Meining, A.
    Semmler, V.
    Kassem, A. M.
    Sander, R.
    Frankenberger, U.
    Burzin, M.
    Reichenberger, J.
    Bajbouj, M.
    Prinz, C.
    Schmid, R. M.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (04) : 345 - 349
  • [7] Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Agostoni, M.
    Fanti, L.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Gemma, M.
    Strini, G.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (11) : 1024 - 1029
  • [8] Propofol versus Midazolam for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tsai, Hsiao-Chien
    Lin, Yu-Cih
    Ko, Ching-Lung
    Lou, Horng-Yuan
    Chen, Ta-Liang
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    Chen, Chien-Yu
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [9] Comparison of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol as an optimal sedative for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A randomized controlled trial
    Samson, Sumanth
    George, Sagiev Koshy
    Vinoth, B.
    Khan, Mohd Saif
    Akila, Bridgitte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 5 (02) : 51 - 57
  • [10] Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guacho, John Alexander Lata
    de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
    Ribeiro, Igor Braga
    da Ponte Neto, Alberto Machado
    Singh, Shailendra
    Tucci, Marina Gammaro Baldavira
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 12 (08):