The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions

被引:1228
|
作者
Cable, DM
DeRue, DS
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flager Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Monitor Grp, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0021-9010.87.875
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examined whether employees develop perceptions about 3 different types of fit: person-organization fit, needs-supplies fit, and demands-abilities fit. Confirmatory factor analyses of data from 2 different samples strongly suggested that employees differentiate between these 3 types of fit. Furthermore, results from a longitudinal design of 187 managers supported both the convergent and discriminant validity of the different types of fit perceptions. Specifically, person-organization fit perceptions were related to organization-focused outcomes (e.g., organizational identification, citizenship behaviors, turnover decisions), whereas needs-supplies fit perceptions were related to job- and career-focused outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction, career satisfaction, occupational commitment). Although demands-abilities fit perceptions emerged as a distinct construct, they were not related to hypothesized outcomes (e.g., job performance, raises).
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 884
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity
    Spuling, Svenja M.
    Klusmann, Verena
    Bowen, Catherine E.
    Kornadt, Anna E.
    Kessler, Eva-Marie
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2020, 17 (04) : 445 - 455
  • [2] The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity
    Svenja M. Spuling
    Verena Klusmann
    Catherine E. Bowen
    Anna E. Kornadt
    Eva-Marie Kessler
    [J]. European Journal of Ageing, 2020, 17 : 445 - 455
  • [3] Correction to: The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity
    Svenja M. Spuling
    Verena Klusmann
    Catherine E. Bowen
    Anna E. Kornadt
    Eva-Marie Kessler
    [J]. European Journal of Ageing, 2021, 18 : 287 - 287
  • [4] ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY
    ATWOOD, JR
    HINSHAW, AS
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1993, 16 (03) : 231 - 233
  • [5] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE WIST
    LOVALLO, WR
    SENGEL, RA
    LEBER, WR
    SHAFFER, B
    PISHKIN, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 39 (03) : 321 - 325
  • [6] The uniqueness of subjective ageing: convergent and discriminant validity (vol 17, pg 445, 2020)
    Spuling, Svenja M.
    Klusmann, Verena
    Bowen, Catherine E.
    Kornadt, Anna E.
    Kessler, Eva-Marie
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2021, 18 (02) : 289 - 289
  • [7] The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity
    Arthaud-Day, ML
    Rode, JC
    Mooney, CH
    Near, JP
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2005, 74 (03) : 445 - 476
  • [8] The Subjective Well-being Construct: A Test of its Convergent, Discriminant, and Factorial Validity
    Marne L Arthaud-day
    Joseph C Rode
    Christine H. Mooney
    Janet P. Near
    [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2005, 74 : 445 - 476
  • [9] Convergent and discriminant validity of the Tower of Hanoi
    Voelbel, GT
    Bates, ME
    Labouvie, EW
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (02): : 275 - 275
  • [10] Discriminant and convergent validity of a subjective quality-of-life instrument aimed at high content validity for schizophrenic persons
    M. Franz
    M. Fritz
    T. Meyer
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2013, 22 : 1113 - 1122