Partnerships, power and the "new" politics of community participation in British health care

Multi-sectoral approaches to health improvement in it broadest sense have entailed an emphasis by the British government upon partnership working ill and around community involvement in planning processes. New service planning and delivery organization in The health service-primary care groups and primary care trusts - thus have to ensure that public and patient involvement strategies reflect a coordinated, if not integrated, multi-sectoral approach to such involvement. But how are these enforced partnership arrangements shaping the approach taken by Primary care groups and trusts to the issue of public and patient involvement? More particularly, is the traditional dominance of health service managers and the medical profession in decision-making processes under challenge? This article draws on a study of primary;- care group and trusts in three districts in order to gauge perception and calculation with regard to partnerships for involvement. Results appear to suggest that health service managers and practitioners continue to exercise considerable influence in comparison to that of patient and citizen. But, if the findings are viewed in the broader contexts of government managerialist strategies of surveillance and accountability and the growth of service-user and advocacy organizations, partnerships may offer significant scope for "lay" challenges to managerial and medical power.