Pain relief and motor function during continuous interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between levobupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.25% or 0.4%

被引:19
|
作者
Borghi, B.
Facchini, F. E.
Agnoletti, V.
Adduci, A.
Lambertini, A.
Marini, E.
Gallerani, P.
Sassoli, V.
Luppi, M.
Casati, A.
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Osped Maggiore, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] IRCCS, Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Anaesthesiol, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[4] IRCCS, Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
[5] Shoulder & Elbow Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
[6] Dept Pharm, Bologna, Italy
关键词
anaesthesia conduction; interscalene brachial plexus block; postoperative period; anaesthetics local; ropivacaine; levobupivacaine; analgesia; postoperative; surgery orthopaedic; shoulder; nerve block; brachial plexus; continuous peripheral nerve blocks;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021506000962
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: To compare pain relief and motor impairment of 0.25% levobupivacaine with either an equivalent (0.25%) or equipotent (0.4%) concentration of ropivacaine for continuous interscalene block after open shoulder surgery. Methods: Seventy-two adult patients scheduled for elective major shoulder surgery received an interscalene injection of mepivacaine 1.5% 30mL followed by 24h patient-controlled interscalene analgesia (basal infusion rate: 5mL h(-1); incremental bolus: 2 mL; lockout period: 10 min; maximum boluses per hour: 4) with either 0.25% levobupivacaine (n = 24), 0.25% ropivacaine (n = 24) or 0.4% ropivacaine (n = 24). A blinded observer recorded the evolution of pain relief and recovery of motor block during the first 24 h. Motor function was assessed as the maximum pressure developed while squeezing a sphygmomanometer cuff with the blocked hand. The reduction from preoperative values was considered as an index of motor impairment. Results: No differences were reported among the three groups in the quality of postoperative analgesia. The number of incremental patient-controlled interscalene analgesia doses, total volume of local anaesthetic infused during the 24-h patient-controlled interscalene analgesia, and number of rescue ketoprofen analgesia were higher in the ropivacaine 0.25% group than in the other two groups (P = 0.0005). The hand strength recovered to >= 90% of baseline values within the first 24 h of infusion in all groups, without differences among the three groups. Conclusion: When providing patient-controlled interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.4% ropivacaine performed equally in terms of pain relief, motor block and number of patient-controlled boluses required, while patients receiving 0.25% ropivacaine needed significantly more boluses and rescue analgesia to control their pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1009
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain
    Holly A. Muir
    Desmond Writer
    Joanne Douglas
    Sally Weeks
    David Gambling
    Alison Macarthur
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997, 44 : 599 - 604
  • [2] Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain
    Muir, HA
    Writer, D
    Douglas, J
    Weeks, S
    Gambling, D
    Macarthur, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (06): : 599 - 604
  • [3] Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: A randomized, double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine
    Casati, A
    Borghi, B
    Fanelli, G
    Montone, N
    Rotini, R
    Fraschini, G
    Vinciguerra, F
    Torri, G
    Chelly, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (01): : 253 - 259
  • [4] ROPIVACAINE 0.25-PERCENT VERSUS BUPIVACAINE 0.25-PERCENT FOR CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON
    STIENSTRA, R
    JONKER, TA
    BOURDREZ, P
    KUIJPERS, JC
    VANKLEEF, JW
    LUNDBERG, U
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (02): : 285 - 289
  • [5] Continuous interscalene infusion and single injection using levobupivacaine for analgesia after surgery of the shoulder - A double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Kean, J.
    Wigderowitz, C. A.
    Coventry, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (09): : 1173 - 1177
  • [6] Diaphragm function after interscalene brachial plexus block: a double-blind, randomized comparison of 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine
    Thackeray, Elizabeth M.
    Swenson, Jeffrey D.
    Gertsch, Matthew C.
    Phillips, Kathleen M.
    Steele, John W.
    Burks, Robert T.
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Greis, Patrick E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (03) : 381 - 386
  • [7] Ultrasound guided peritubal infiltration of 0.25% Bupivacaine versus 0.25% Ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective double blind randomized study
    Parikh, Geeta P.
    Shah, Veena R.
    Vora, Kalpana S.
    Parikh, Beena K.
    Modi, Manisha P.
    Kumari, Pratibha
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 58 (03) : 293 - 297
  • [8] Prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison of the effects of caudally administered levobupivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% on pain and motor block in children undergoing circumcision surgery
    Kaya, Z.
    Suren, M.
    Arici, S.
    Karaman, S.
    Tapar, H.
    Erdemir, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (14) : 2014 - 2020
  • [9] A Comparison of Differences Between the Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine During Continuous Epidural Infusion: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Perotti, Luciano
    Cusato, Maria
    Ingelmo, Pablo
    Niebel, Thekla Larissa
    Somaini, Marta
    Riva, Francesca
    Tinelli, Carmine
    De Andres, Jose
    Fanelli, Guido
    Braschi, Antonio
    Regazzi, Mario
    Allegri, Massimo
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 121 (02): : 348 - 356
  • [10] Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for continuous sciatic nerve block: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with 0.2% ropivacaine
    Casati, A
    Vinciguerra, F
    Cappelleri, G
    Aldegheri, G
    Grispigni, C
    Putzu, M
    Rivoltini, P
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03): : 919 - 923