The goals and promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

被引:189
|
作者
Coates, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES | 2007年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1257/jep.21.1.91
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The primary goal of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was to fix auditing of U.S. public companies, consistent with its full, official name: the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. By consensus, auditing had been working poorly, and increasingly so. The most important, and most promising, part of Sarbanes-Oxley was the creation of a unique, quasi-public institution to oversee and regulate auditing, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In controversial section 404, the law also created new disclosure-based incentives for firms to spend money on internal controls, above increases that would have occurred after the corporate scandals of the early 2000s. In exchange for these higher costs, which have already fallen substantially, Sarbanes-Oxley promises a variety of long-term benefits. Investors will face a lower risk of losses from fraud and theft, and benefit from more reliable financial reporting, greater transparency, and accountability. Public companies will pay a lower cost of capital, and the economy will benefit because of a better allocation of resources and faster growth. Sarbanes-Oxley remains a work in progress - section 404 in particular was implemented too aggressively - but reformers should push for continued improvements in its implementation, by PCAOB, rather than for repeal of the legislation itself.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 116
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley act
    Maspanov, Iivi
    Valdur, Riin
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES IN BUSINESS AND PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 72 - 75
  • [2] An historical perspective on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    Govekar, Paul L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT HISTORY, 2008, 14 (03) : 284 - +
  • [3] The Unintended Effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    Chhaochharia, Vidhi
    Otto, Clemens A.
    Vig, Vikrant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2011, 167 (01): : 149 - 164
  • [4] The Ripple Effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    Voigt, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2011, 167 (01): : 165 - 167
  • [5] An institutional perspective of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    Baker, Richard L.
    Bealing, William E., Jr.
    Nelson, Donald A.
    Staley, A. Blair
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2006, 21 (01) : 23 - +
  • [6] Halliburton executive blasts Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    Fletcher, S
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2003, 101 (23) : 26 - 27
  • [7] Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    Zhang, Ivy Xiying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2007, 44 (1-2): : 74 - 115
  • [8] The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Records management implications
    Stephens, David O.
    [J]. RECORDS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 15 (02) : 98 - +
  • [9] The propensity to save: The effect of Sarbanes-Oxley act
    James, Hui Liang
    Lirely, Roger
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (01) : 77 - 96
  • [10] Sarbanes-Oxley
    Factor, Mallory
    [J]. FORTUNE, 2006, 154 (05) : 21 - 21