TRUS-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy with template for the diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Guo, Gang [1 ]
Xu, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Peoples Liberat Army, Dept Urol, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate needle biopsy; 12+X cores; prostate-specific antigen; transperineal; MRI; HISTOSCANNING(TM); 10-CORE; FUSION; VOLUME;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2017.6051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of the present study was to explore the clinical value and safety of trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Patients who received a TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer at the General Hospital of The People's Liberation Army between September 2009 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, this consisted of 1,300 patients. These patients were randomly divided into the 12+X core group or the standard 12-core group. The mean age of all the patients was 70.5 years old. Levels of prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were checked and used as reference prior and subsequent to the biopsy procedure. The 12+X core group consisted of 937 patients and the 12-core group consisted of 363 patients. The mean number of core samples taken from both groups was 14.5 (ranging from 12 to 24) and the mean operative time of the whole group was 20.4 min (ranging from 15 to 40 min). The puncture positive detection rate of abnormal rectal examination, trans-rectal ultrasound, and MRI was 24.0, 30.1, and 59.2%, respectively, whereas the puncture positive rate was 47.2% in 12+X core group and 34.5% in 12-core group. Improved prostate needle biopsy with 12+X cores was found to have significantly higher detection rate than that with 12 cores as well as fewer post-operative complications, therefore making the method ideal for diagnosing prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4863 / 4867
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transperineal TRUS-guided prostate biopsy
    Ficarra, V.
    Novella, G.
    Galfano, A.
    Artibani, W.
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2007, 74 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [2] Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Alevizos, Alevizos
    Karanasiou, Vasilisa
    Mariolis, Anargiros
    Mihas, Constantinos
    Papathanasiou, Marek
    Bovis, Konstantinos
    Sofras, Frangiskos
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2007, 78 (04) : 313 - 317
  • [3] Repeat TRUS-guided biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
    Silvederio, C. C.
    Huned, D.
    Devand, L.
    Yam, W. L.
    Ng, F. C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 40 - 40
  • [4] Prostate biopsy - The TRUS-guided Punch Biopsy to be learned
    Franzaring, Ludger
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2014, 45 (01) : 15 - 16
  • [5] Can we improve the detection rate of prostate cancer using standard 12-core TRUS-guided prostate biopsy? Focused on the location of prostate biopsy
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Suh, Jungyo
    Park, Juhyun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Son, Hwancheol
    Jeong, Hyeon
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (11): : 3758 - 3764
  • [6] Critical evaluation of MRI-targeted TRUS-guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Roethke, Matthias
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Boxler, Silvan
    Seidenader, Jonas
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [7] How to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer using of standard 12-Core TRUS-guided Prostate Biopsy: Impacts of the location of biopsied core
    Huh, J. S.
    Bae, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 173 - 173
  • [8] 3D Navigo™ versus TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection
    Gayet, Maudy
    van der Aa, Anouk
    Schmitz, Peter
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    Schrier, Bart Ph.
    Mulders, Peter F. A.
    Mischi, Massimo
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (09) : 1255 - 1260
  • [9] 3D Navigo™ versus TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection
    Maudy Gayet
    Anouk van der Aa
    Peter Schmitz
    Harrie P. Beerlage
    Bart Ph. Schrier
    Peter F. A. Mulders
    Massimo Mischi
    Hessel Wijkstra
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 1255 - 1260
  • [10] Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies
    Shady Nafie
    Raj P. Pal
    John P. Dormer
    Masood A. Khan
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 971 - 975