Determining the benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation on functional upper limb movement in chronic stroke

被引:12
|
作者
Marquez, Jodie L. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Conley, Alexander C. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Karayanidis, Frini [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Miller, James [1 ]
Lagopoulos, Jim [6 ]
Parsons, Mark W. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth & Med, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Prior Res Ctr Stroke & Brain Injury, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Funct Neuroimaging Lab, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[5] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
chronic stroke; transcranial direct current stimulation; upper limb function; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MOTOR FUNCTION; CORTICAL STIMULATION; SINGLE-SESSION; DC STIMULATION; CORTEX; TDCS; REHABILITATION; EXCITABILITY; POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000220
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a tool to enhance stroke rehabilitation; however, evidence to support its use is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Twenty five participants were allocated to receive 20 min of 1 mA of anodal, cathodal or sham cortical stimulation in a random, counterbalanced order. Patients and assessors were blinded to the intervention at each time point. The primary outcome was upper limb performance as measured by the Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (total score, fine motor subtest score and gross motor subtest score) as well as grip strength. Each outcome was assessed at baseline and at the conclusion of each intervention in both upper limbs. Neither anodal nor cathodal stimulation resulted in statistically significantly improved upper limb performance on any of the measured tasks compared with sham stimulation (P > 0.05). When the data were analysed according to disability, participants with moderate/severe disability showed significantly improved gross motor function following cathodal stimulation compared with sham (P = 0.014). However, this was accompanied by decreased key grip strength in the unaffected hand (P = 0.003). We are unable to endorse the use of anodal and cathodal tDCS in the management of upper limb dysfunction in chronic stroke patients. Although there appears to be more potential for the use of cathodal stimulation in patients with severe disability, the effects were small and must be considered with caution as they were accompanied by unanticipated effects in the unaffected upper limb. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects on upper limb function in chronic stroke
    Miller, J.
    Marquez, J.
    Van Vliet, P.
    Lagopoulos, J.
    Parsons, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2013, 8 : 22 - 22
  • [2] Transcranial direct current stimulation for motor recovery of upper limb function after stroke
    Luedemann-Podubecka, Jitka
    Boesl, Kathrin
    Rothhardt, Sandra
    Verheyden, Geert
    Nowak, Dennis Alexander
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 47 : 245 - 259
  • [3] Transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive functional task-oriented programme for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors
    Adeagbo, Caleb Adewumi
    Olawale, Olajide Ayinla
    Gbiri, Caleb Ademola Omuwa
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2021, 26 (06) : 420 - 427
  • [4] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning and upper limb function after stroke
    Fleming, M.
    Rothwell, J.
    Sztriha, L.
    Teo, J.
    Newham, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2016, 11 : S9 - S9
  • [5] Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
    Miu, Ka Ying Doris
    Kok, Ching
    Leung, Sau Shan
    Chan, Elaine Y. L.
    Wong, Elaine
    [J]. ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2020, 44 (06): : 428 - 437
  • [6] The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
    Zhang, Xiao-Hua
    Gu, Tao
    Liu, Xuan-Wei
    Han, Ping
    Lv, Hui-Lan
    Wang, Yu-Long
    Xiao, Peng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [7] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning and upper limb function after stroke
    Fleming, Melanie K.
    Rothwell, John C.
    Sztriha, Laszlo
    Teo, James T.
    Newham, Di J.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (07) : 1389 - 1398
  • [8] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: future directions.
    Elsner, Bernhard
    Kugler, Joachim
    Mehrholz, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 15
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: future directions.
    Bernhard Elsner
    Joachim Kugler
    Jan Mehrholz
    [J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15
  • [10] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Yoga for Functional Movement Disorders
    Park, Jung E.
    Hong, Ji-Yi
    Lee, Su-Young
    [J]. NEUROLOGIST, 2021, 26 (06) : 231 - 236