Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir

被引:43
|
作者
Johnson, G. R.
Gartner, Barbara L.
机构
[1] USDA, US Forest Serv, Forestry Sci Lab, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Wood Sci & Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
MOE; density; heritability; genetic correlation;
D O I
10.1007/s11295-006-0054-0
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Douglas-fir trees from 39 open-pollinated families at four test locations were assessed to estimate heritability of modulus of elasticity (MOE) and basic density. After trees were felled, sound velocity was measured on 4-m logs with the Director HM200. Disks were taken to estimate dry and green wood density; dynamic MOE was estimated as green density x (sound veloeity)(2). Heritability estimates of MOE (across-site h(2)=0.55) were larger than those for total height (0. 15) and diameter at breast height (DBH; 0.29), and similar to those for density (0.59). Negative genetic correlations were found for MOE with height (r(A)=-0.30) and DBH (r(A) =-0.5 1), and were similar to those found for density with height (r(A)= -0.52) and DBH (r(A) =-0.57). The partial correlations of height with MOE and density, while holding DBH constant, were positive, implying that the observed negative correlations between height and the wood properties were a function of the high positive correlation between height and D13H and the strong negative correlations between DBH and the wood properties. Taper [DBH/(height-1.4)] was found to be negatively associated with MOE. Selection for MOE may produce greater gains than selection for density because MOE had a larger coefficient of additive variation (9.6%) than density (5.1%). Conversely, selection for growth may have a more negative impact on MOE than density because of the greater genetic variation associated with MOE. Family mean correlations of the wood quality traits with stem form and crown health were mostly nonsignificant.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir
    G. R. Johnson
    Barbara L. Gartner
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2006, 3 : 25 - 33
  • [2] Genetic variation in response to shade in coastal Douglas-fir
    St Clair, JB
    Sniezko, RA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1999, 29 (11): : 1751 - 1763
  • [3] GENETIC-VARIATION IN THE WOOD DENSITY AND RING WIDTH TREND IN COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR
    MCKIMMY, MD
    CAMPBELL, RK
    SILVAE GENETICA, 1982, 31 (2-3) : 43 - 51
  • [4] GENETIC-VARIATION IN CAMBIAL PHENOLOGY OF COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR
    LI, P
    ADAMS, WT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1994, 24 (09): : 1864 - 1870
  • [5] MODULUS OF ELASTICITY AND TENSILE-STRENGTH OF DOUGLAS-FIR ROOTS
    COMMANDEUR, PR
    PYLES, MR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1991, 21 (01): : 48 - 52
  • [6] GENETIC-VARIATION OF WOOD DENSITY COMPONENTS IN YOUNG COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR - IMPLICATIONS FOR TREE BREEDING
    VARGASHERNANDEZ, J
    ADAMS, WT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1991, 21 (12): : 1801 - 1807
  • [7] GENETIC-VARIATION OF WOOD SHRINKAGE IN A PROGENY TEST OF COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR
    KOSHY, MP
    LESTER, DT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1994, 24 (08) : 1734 - 1740
  • [8] Genetic variation in direct and indirect measures of wood stiffness in coastal Douglas-fir
    Cherry, Marilyn L.
    Vikram, Vikas
    Briggs, David
    Cress, Daniel W.
    Howe, Glenn T.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2008, 38 (09) : 2476 - 2486
  • [9] FAMILY VARIATION IN AGE TRENDS OF WOOD DENSITY TRAITS IN YOUNG COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR
    VARGASHERNANDEZ, J
    ADAMS, WT
    KRAHMER, RL
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 1994, 26 (02): : 229 - 236
  • [10] Genetic variation in drought hardiness of coastal Douglas-fir seedlings from British Columbia
    Anekonda, TS
    Lomas, MC
    Adams, WT
    Kavanagh, KL
    Aitken, SN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2002, 32 (10) : 1701 - 1716