Punching above its weight: life cycle energy accounting and environmental assessment of vanadium microalloying in reinforcement bar steel

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Pranav Pradeep [1 ,2 ]
Santos, David A. [3 ,4 ]
Braham, Erick J. [3 ,4 ]
Sellers, Diane G. [3 ,4 ]
Banerjee, Sarbajit [3 ,4 ]
Dixit, Manish K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Chem, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EMBODIED ENERGY; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; MICROSTRUCTURE; BUILDINGS; PRECIPITATION; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1039/d0em00424c
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Steel-reinforced concrete is ubiquitously used in construction across the world. The United Nations estimates that the worldwide energy consumption of buildings accounts for 30-40% of global energy production, underlining the importance of the judicious selection of construction materials. Much effort has focused on the use of high-strength low-alloy steels in reinforcement bars whose economy of materials use is predicated upon improved yield strengths in comparison to low-carbon steels. While microalloying is known to allow for reduced steel consumption, a sustainability analysis in terms of embodied energy and CO2 has not thus far been performed. Here we calculate the impact of supplanting lower grade reinforcement bars with higher strength vanadium microalloyed steels on embodied energy and carbon footprint. We find that the increased strength of vanadium microalloyed steel translates into substantial material savings over mild steel, thereby reducing the total global fossil carbon footprint by as much as 0.385%. A more granular analysis pegs savings for China and the European Union at 1.01 and 0.19%, respectively, of their respective emissions. Our cradle-to-gate analysis provides an accounting of the role of microalloying in reducing the carbon footprint of the steel and construction industries and highlights the underappreciated role of alloying elements.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 290
页数:17
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Punching above its weight: Life cycle energy accounting and environmental assessment of vanadium microalloying in reinforcement bar steel
    Pradeep Kumar, Pranav
    Santos, David A.
    Braham, Erick J.
    Sellers, Diane G.
    Banerjee, Sarbajit
    Dixit, Manish K.
    [J]. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 2021, 23 (02): : 275 - 290
  • [2] Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of coriander seed production using material flow cost accounting and life cycle assessment
    Dekamin, Majid
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Afshar, Reza Keshavarz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (55) : 83469 - 83482
  • [3] Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of coriander seed production using material flow cost accounting and life cycle assessment
    Majid Dekamin
    Kamran Kheiralipour
    Reza Keshavarz Afshar
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 83469 - 83482
  • [4] Environmental Evaluation for Three Typical Steel Pipe Production Processes Based on Energy Materials and Life Cycle Assessment
    Su, Wei
    Ma, Hongzhi
    Ma, Yuhui
    Wang, Qunhui
    Che, Xingyu
    [J]. ADVANCED RESEARCH ON ENERGY MATERIALS AND MATERIAL APPLICATION, 2012, 578 : 25 - +
  • [5] Environmental impact assessment of steel reinforcing bar manufacturing process from scrap materials using life cycle assessment method: a case study on the Ethiopian metal industries
    Fente, Teferea Eniyew
    Tsegaw, Assefa Asmare
    [J]. DISCOVER APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [6] Improving the nuclear energy sustainability by decreasing its environmental footprint. Guidelines from life cycle assessment simulations
    Poinssot, Ch.
    Bourg, S.
    Boullis, B.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2016, 92 : 234 - 241