Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment

被引:16
|
作者
Gunning, Amy C. [1 ]
Maier, Ronald V. [2 ]
de Rooij, Doret [1 ]
Leenen, Luke P. H. [1 ]
Hietbrink, Falco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Trauma Surg, Suite G04-228,Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; Severely injured patients; International comparative assessment; Bleeding complications; Thromboembolic events;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-019-01208-z
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) are a major concern after acute survival from trauma. Variations in treatment protocols for trauma patients exist worldwide. This study analyzes the differences in the number of VTE events and the associated complications of thromboprophylaxis between two level I trauma populations utilizing varying treatment protocols. Methods International multicenter trauma registry-based study was performed at the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) in The Netherlands (early commencement chemical prophylaxis), and Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in the United States (restrictive early chemical prophylaxis). All severely injured patients (ISS >= 16), aged >= 18 years, and admitted in 2013 were included. Primary outcomes were VTE [deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (no screening), pulmonary embolism (PE)], and hemorrhagic complications. Results In UMCU, 279 patients were included and in HMC, 974 patients. Overall, 75% of the admitted trauma patients in UMCU and 81% in HMC (p < 0.001) received thromboprophylaxis, of which 100% in and 75% at, respectively, UMCU and HMC consisted of chemical prophylaxis. From these patients, 72% at UMCU and 47% at HMC (p < 0.001) were treated within 48 h after arrival. At UMCU, 4 patients (1.4%) (PE = 3, DVT = 1) and HMC 37 patients (3.8%) (PE = 22, DVT = 16; p = 0.06) developed a VTE. At UMCU, a greater percent of patients with VTE had traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Most VTE occurred despite adequate prophylaxis being given (75% UMCU and 81% HMC). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in, respectively, 4 (1.4%) and 10 (1%) patients in UMCU and HMC (p = 0.570). After adjustment for age, ISS, HLOS, and injury type, no significant difference was demonstrated in UMCU compared to HMC for the development of VTE, OR 2.397, p = 0.102 and hemorrhagic complications, OR 0. 586, p = 0.383. Conclusions A more early commencement protocol resulted in almost twice as much chemical prophylaxis being started within the first 48 h in comparison with a more delayed initiation of treatment. Interestingly, most episodes of VTE developed while receiving recommended prophylaxis. Early chemical thromboprophylaxis did not significantly increase the bleeding complications and it appears to be safe to start early.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
    Amy C. Gunning
    Ronald V. Maier
    Doret de Rooij
    Luke P. H. Leenen
    Falco Hietbrink
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021, 47 : 137 - 143
  • [2] Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Cirrhotic Patients on VTE Prophylaxis
    Alsheikh, Mira
    Kamar, Khalil
    Madala, Samragnyi
    Sharma, Rubal
    Almoussawi, Hassan
    Sasso, Roula
    Deeb, Liliane
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S508 - S509
  • [3] Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis in Surgical patients, Are We Doing It Right?
    Mohamed, I.
    Wright, J.
    Graham, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 : 18 - 18
  • [4] Venous Thromboembolism VTE-Prophylaxis for Patients with Renal Insufficiency
    Kretzschmar, Alexander
    HAMOSTASEOLOGIE, 2018, 38 (01): : 54 - 54
  • [5] Audit Of Compliance With Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Guidelines In Patients With Hospital Acquired VTE
    O'Rourke, E.
    O'Doherty, R.
    Tierney, A.
    Ewins, K.
    Buckley, R.
    Ni Ainle, F.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 4) : 47 - 48
  • [6] CANCER-ASSOCIATED VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) PROPHYLAXIS: A COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
    Almohammed, O. A.
    Lai, L.
    Khanfar, N. M.
    Bleidt, B. A.
    Aljadhey, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S56 - S56
  • [7] 81An Audit of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment & Prophylaxis Implementation
    Woolner, B.
    Moore, P.
    Parker, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [8] Danaparoid for antenatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prophylaxis
    Appiah-Cubi, S.
    Shannon, M. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2008, 141 : 79 - 79
  • [9] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis compliance. Is teaching important to improve VTE prophylaxis compliance or not?!
    Maatouk, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 199 - 200
  • [10] ADHERENCE TO GUIDELINES FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) PROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALIZED CANCER PATIENTS.
    Lin, Ruth Zu-Kei
    Huang, Esther
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2017, 44 (02)