Conical Primary Cementless Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: 94 Consecutive Implantations at a Mean Follow-Up of 12.7 years

被引:3
|
作者
Romagnoli, Sergio [1 ]
Marullo, Matteo [1 ]
Corbella, Michele [1 ]
Zero, Enrico [2 ]
Parente, Andrea [3 ]
Bargagliotti, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Joint Replacement Dept, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Informat Bioengn Robot & Syst Engn, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Milan, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2021年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; hip revision surgery; primary cementless stem; aseptic loosening; survivorship; POROUS-COATED STEMS; UNITED-STATES; BRIEF CLASSIFICATIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PROJECTIONS; COMPONENT; SURGERY; VARUS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision of a failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) poses technical challenges. The use of primary stems for revision can be advantageous for maintaining bone stock and reducing complications: small case series have reported promising results in the short-term to mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and functional results and survivorship of a consecutive series of THA femoral component revisions using a conical primary cementless stem (PCS). Methods: Ninety-four stem revisions with a preoperative Paprosky I or II defect were analyzed at an average follow-up of 12.7 +/- 5.4 years. Aseptic loosening was the reason for revision in 92.5% of cases. Twenty patients were lost to follow-up. Two subgroups were created: Group 1 (n = 59) underwent isolated stem revision; Group 2 (n = 15) underwent complete THA revision. All were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively based on the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) score, and the visual analog scale for pain (VAS). Residual trochanteric pain and length discrepancies were recorded. Radiographic evaluation included signs of osteolysis, subsidence, loosening, and heterotopic ossification. Results: PCS survivorship was 100% at 5 years and 95.9% at 10 years. Overall, significant postoperative improvements (P < .01) were observed on the HHS (44.3 vs 86.9), WOMAC (42.8 vs 82.8), and VAS (7.0 vs 3.0). Postoperative scores on all scales were higher for Group 1 (P < .01). Three patients (4.1%) underwent further stem revision. Demarcation lines (1 mm) were found in 12 (16.2%) patients and significant heterotopic ossifications in 22 (29.7%). Conclusion: The use of PCS for stem revision in failed THA with a limited femoral bone defect is a reliable option for both isolated stem revision and concomitant cup revision in well-selected patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1080 / 1086
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cementless Revision for Infected Hip Arthroplasty: an 8.6 Years Follow-up
    Li, Peng
    Hou, Ming
    Zhu, Zhi-qi
    Shi, Zhan-jun
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2015, 7 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [2] Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years
    Uriarte, Iker
    Moreta, Jesus
    Cortes, Laura
    Bernuy, Lucia
    Aguirre, Urko
    Martinez de los Mozos, Jose Luis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02): : 281 - 289
  • [3] Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years
    Iker Uriarte
    Jesús Moreta
    Laura Cortés
    Lucía Bernuy
    Urko Aguirre
    José Luis Martínez de los Mozos
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2020, 30 : 281 - 289
  • [4] The Synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years
    De Martino, I.
    De Santis, V.
    D'Apolito, R.
    Sculco, P. K.
    Cross, M. B.
    Gasparini, G.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (01): : 29 - 36
  • [5] Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up
    Sivananthan, Sureshan
    Lim, Chin-Tat
    Narkbunnam, Rapeepat
    Sox-Harris, Alex
    Huddleston, James I., III
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04): : 1245 - 1249
  • [6] Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up of a Cementless, Modular, Tapered Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty
    Weiss, Rudiger J.
    Beckman, Mats O.
    Enocson, Anders
    Schmalholz, Anders
    Stark, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (01): : 16 - 23
  • [7] Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up
    Valtanen, Rosa S.
    Hwang, Katherine L.
    Amanatullah, Derek F.
    Huddleston, James I.
    Maloney, William J.
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (05): : 903 - 908
  • [8] Revision Hip Arthroplasty with A Modular Cementless Stem: Mid-Term Follow Up
    Jibodh, Stefan R.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Anthony, Shawn G.
    Malchau, Henrik
    Dempsey, Kyle E.
    Estok, Daniel M., II
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (07): : 1167 - 1172
  • [9] Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up
    Alexander Schuh
    Stefanie Werber
    Ulrich Holzwarth
    Günther Zeiler
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2004, 124 : 306 - 309
  • [10] Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up
    Schuh, A
    Werber, S
    Holzwarth, U
    Zeiler, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2004, 124 (05) : 306 - 309