Salivary metabolomics with alternative decision tree-based machine learning methods for breast cancer discrimination

被引:62
|
作者
Murata, Takeshi [1 ]
Yanagisawa, Takako [2 ]
Kurihara, Toshiaki [3 ]
Kaneko, Miku [4 ]
Ota, Sana [4 ]
Enomoto, Ayame [4 ]
Tomita, Masaru [4 ]
Sugimoto, Masahiro [4 ,5 ]
Sunamura, Makoto [6 ]
Hayashida, Tetsu [3 ]
Kitagawa, Yuko [3 ]
Jinno, Hiromitsu [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg, Chuo Ku, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Itabashi Ku, 2-11-1 Kaga, Tokyo 1738606, Japan
[3] Keio Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Shinjuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1600016, Japan
[4] Keio Univ, Inst Adv Biosci, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 9970052, Japan
[5] Tokyo Med Univ, Res & Dev Ctr Minimally Invas Therapies, Hlth Promot & Preempt Med, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608402, Japan
[6] Tokyo Med Univ, Digest Surg & Transplantat Surg, Hachioji Med Ctr, Tokyo 1930998, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer; Biomarker; Saliva; Polyamines; Metabolomics; Alternative decision tree; EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR; LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSTIC-APPROACH; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; EARLY-STAGE; PERFORMANCE; POLYAMINES; MORTALITY; MARKER;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-019-05330-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study is to explore new salivary biomarkers to discriminate breast cancer patients from healthy controls. Methods Saliva samples were collected after 9 h fasting and were immediately stored at - 80 degrees C. Capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry were used to quantify hundreds of hydrophilic metabolites. Conventional statistical analyses and artificial intelligence-based methods were used to assess the discrimination abilities of the quantified metabolites. A multiple logistic regression (MLR) model and an alternative decision tree (ADTree)-based machine learning method were used. The generalization abilities of these mathematical models were validated in various computational tests, such as cross-validation and resampling methods. Results One hundred sixty-six unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 101 patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast (IC), 23 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 42 healthy controls (C). Of the 260 quantified metabolites, polyamines were significantly elevated in the saliva of patients with breast cancer. Spermine showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curves [0.766; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.671-0.840, P < 0.0001] to discriminate IC from C. In addition to spermine, polyamines and their acetylated forms were elevated in IC only. Two hundred each of two-fold, five-fold, and ten-fold cross-validation using different random values were conducted and the MLR model had slightly better accuracy. The ADTree with an ensemble approach showed higher accuracy (0.912; 95% CI 0.838-0.961, P < 0.0001). These prediction models also included spermine as a predictive factor. Conclusions These data indicated that combinations of salivary metabolomics with the ADTree-based machine learning methods show potential for non-invasive screening of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 601
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salivary metabolomics with alternative decision tree-based machine learning methods for breast cancer discrimination
    Takeshi Murata
    Takako Yanagisawa
    Toshiaki Kurihara
    Miku Kaneko
    Sana Ota
    Ayame Enomoto
    Masaru Tomita
    Masahiro Sugimoto
    Makoto Sunamura
    Tetsu Hayashida
    Yuko Kitagawa
    Hiromitsu Jinno
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 177 : 591 - 601
  • [2] Machine learning methods with salivary metabolomics for breast cancer detection.
    Murata, Takeshi
    Yanagisawa, Takako
    Kurihara, Toshiaki
    Kaneko, Miku
    Ota, Sana
    Enomoto, Ayame
    Tomita, Masaru
    Sugimoto, Masahiro
    Sunamura, Makoto
    Hayashida, Tetsu
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [3] Application of decision tree-based ensemble learning in the classification of breast cancer
    Ghiasi, Mohammad M.
    Zendehboudi, Sohrab
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 128
  • [4] Tree-Based and Machine Learning Algorithm Analysis for Breast Cancer Classification
    Bhardwaj, Arpit
    Bhardwaj, Harshit
    Sakalle, Aditi
    Uddin, Ziya
    Sakalle, Maneesha
    Ibrahim, Wubshet
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Tree-based Machine Learning Methods for Survey Research
    Kern, Christoph
    Klausch, Thomas
    Kreuter, Frauke
    [J]. SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 13 (01): : 73 - 93
  • [6] A Comparative Analysis of Tree-based Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Detection
    A'la, Fiddin Yusfida
    Permanasari, Adhistya Erna
    Setiawan, Noor Akhmad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEM (ICTS), 2019, : 55 - 59
  • [7] TREE-BASED MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR MODELING AND FORECASTING MORTALITY
    Bjerre, Dorethe Skovgaard
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN-THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 52 (03) : 765 - 787
  • [8] Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology
    Geurts, Pierre
    Irrthum, Alexandre
    Wehenkel, Louis
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2009, 5 (12) : 1593 - 1605
  • [9] On Tree-Based Methods for Similarity Learning
    Clemencon, Stephan
    Vogel, Robin
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, OPTIMIZATION, AND DATA SCIENCE, 2019, 11943 : 676 - 688
  • [10] Classification Tree-Based Machine Learning to Visualize and Validate a Decision Tool for Identifying Malnutrition in Cancer Patients
    Yin, Liangyu
    Lin, Xin
    Liu, Jie
    Li, Na
    He, Xiumei
    Zhang, Mengyuan
    Guo, Jing
    Yang, Jian
    Deng, Li
    Wang, Yizhuo
    Liang, Tingting
    Wang, Chang
    Jiang, Hua
    Fu, Zhenming
    Li, Suyi
    Wang, Kunhua
    Guo, Zengqing
    Ba, Yi
    Li, Wei
    Song, Chunhua
    Cui, Jiuwei
    Shi, Hanping
    Xu, Hongxia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2021, 45 (08) : 1736 - 1748