Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection

被引:22
|
作者
Chipollini, Juan [1 ]
Azizi, Mounsif [2 ]
Lo Vullo, Salvatore [3 ]
Mariani, Luigi [3 ]
Zhu, Yao [4 ]
Ye, Ding W. [4 ]
Ornellas, Antonio Augusto [5 ,6 ]
Watkin, Nick [7 ]
Ager, Michael [7 ]
Hakenberg, Oliver [8 ]
Heidenreich, Axel [9 ]
Raggi, Daniele [3 ]
Catanzaro, Mario [3 ]
Ornellas, Paulo [5 ,6 ]
Salvioni, Roberto [3 ]
Cheriyan, Salim K. [2 ]
Necchi, Andrea [3 ]
Spiess, Phillippe E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, 1501 N Campbell Ave,POB 245077, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[4] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Hosp Mario Kroeff, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Brazilian Canc Inst, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[7] St Georges Univ Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[8] Univ Hosp Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[9] Univ Klinikum Koln, Cologne, Germany
关键词
lymphadenectomy; survival; #PenileCancer; CANCER; SURVIVAL; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14883
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients and methods In all, 532 patients who underwent inguinal LN dissection (ILND) across tertiary referral centres from Europe, China, Brazil and North America were retrospectively evaluated. From this cohort, 198 patients received pelvic LND (PLND).We identified threshold values for ILND and PLND using receiver operating characteristic curves. We tested prognostic value of LNY for recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meir method and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results The median (interquartile [IQR]) age was 59 (49-68) years and the median (IQR) follow-up after ILND was 28 (12-68.2) months. Overall, 85% of the patients had bilateral dissections. The median (IQR) number of inguinal LNs removed was 15 (10-22). Of those receiving PLND, The median (IQR) number of LNs was 13 (8-19). A LNY of >= 15 was used for dichotomisation of ILND patients, and a LNY of >= 9 was used in the PLND cohort. Patients with a LNY >= 15 had significantly better 5-year OS vs patients with a LNY <15 (70.1% vs 58.7%). On multivariable analyses, a LNY >= 15 was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, P = 0.029). For cN0 patients, a LNY >= 15 was an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.52, P = 0.043) and OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.021). In the PLND cohort, a LNY >= 9 was a predictor of RFS (HR 0.53, P = 0.032). Conclusions Using one of the largest LND datasets to date, we found LNY to be a significant predictor of outcomes after lymphatic staging for penile SCC. Prospective validation is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Identifying an Optimal Lymph Node Yield for Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Prognostic Impact of Surgical Dissection
    Chang, Sam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (05): : 1514 - 1515
  • [2] The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in comparison to positive lymph node count in penile squamous cell carcinoma
    Yu, Jiajie
    Long, Qian
    Zhang, Zhiqiang
    Liao, Shufen
    Zheng, Fufu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (12) : 2527 - 2540
  • [3] The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in comparison to positive lymph node count in penile squamous cell carcinoma
    Jiajie Yu
    Qian Long
    Zhiqiang Zhang
    Shufen Liao
    Fufu Zheng
    [J]. International Urology and Nephrology, 2021, 53 : 2527 - 2540
  • [4] The Prognostic Relevance of Subcarinal Lymph Node Dissection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Niwa, Yukiko
    Koike, Masahiko
    Hattori, Masashi
    Iwata, Naoki
    Takami, Hideki
    Hayashi, Masamichi
    Tanaka, Chie
    Kobayashi, Daisuke
    Kanda, Mitsuro
    Yamada, Suguru
    Fujii, Tsutomu
    Nakayama, Goro
    Sugimoto, Hiroyuki
    Fujiwara, Michitaka
    Kodera, Yasuhiro
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 611 - 618
  • [5] The Prognostic Relevance of Subcarinal Lymph Node Dissection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Yukiko Niwa
    Masahiko Koike
    Masashi Hattori
    Naoki Iwata
    Hideki Takami
    Masamichi Hayashi
    Chie Tanaka
    Daisuke Kobayashi
    Mitsuro Kanda
    Suguru Yamada
    Tsutomu Fujii
    Goro Nakayama
    Hiroyuki Sugimoto
    Michitaka Fujiwara
    Yasuhiro Kodera
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 611 - 618
  • [6] Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Levy, Lawrence B.
    Pagliaro, Lance C.
    Tamboli, Pheroze
    Rao, Priya
    Jayaratna, Isuru
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (04) : 591 - 597
  • [7] Lymph Node Dissection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Hsu, Po-Kuei
    Lee, Yi-Ying
    Chuang, Lin -Chi
    Wu, Yu -Chung
    [J]. THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2022, 32 (04) : 497 - 510
  • [8] Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection
    Azizi, Mounsif
    Peyton, Charles C.
    Boulware, David C.
    Chipollini, Juan
    Juwono, Timothy
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (06): : 1085 - 1090
  • [9] The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection
    Jian-Ye Liu
    Yong-Hong Li
    Zhi-Ling Zhang
    Kai Yao
    Yun-Lin Ye
    Dan Xie
    Hui Han
    Zhou-Wei Liu
    Zi-Ke Qin
    Fang-Jian Zhou
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 1519 - 1524
  • [10] The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection
    Liu, Jian-Ye
    Li, Yong-Hong
    Zhang, Zhi-Ling
    Yao, Kai
    Ye, Yun-Lin
    Xie, Dan
    Han, Hui
    Liu, Zhou-Wei
    Qin, Zi-Ke
    Zhou, Fang-Jian
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) : 1519 - 1524