Evaluating normalisation: An argument-based approach

被引:4
|
作者
Yoon, Sook Jhee [1 ]
Gruba, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Normalisation; Language program evaluation; Blended language learning; Constructive alignment; HIGHER-EDUCATION; TECHNOLOGY; NATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2019.04.008
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Now integral to our daily lives, the use of networked technologies is an expected part of modern language teaching. Grounded in concepts set out by Bax, we set out an argument-based approach to examine the constructive alignment of digital materials and learning outcomes in a blended modern language program. Through participatory action research, document analysis and stakeholder interviews, we focus on the ways that materials are understood and used by language educators and students alike. Analysis of the data points to areas of moderate support for the claim that normalization has been achieved, and mismatches are particularly prominent in the realm of stakeholder expectations. Importantly, the paper contributes to a view that a focus on blended materials provides insights into the processes of normalisation, and may well be predicated on the constructive alignment of materials design and learning outcomes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 12
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN ARGUMENT-BASED APPROACH TO VALIDITY
    KANE, MT
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) : 527 - 535
  • [2] The Argument-Based Approach to Validation
    Kane, Michael
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 42 (04) : 448 - 457
  • [3] An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
    Dung, PM
    Son, TC
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 133 (1-2) : 35 - 85
  • [4] An Argument-Based Approach to Deal with Wastewater Discharges
    Aulinas, Montse
    Tolchinsky, Pancho
    Turon, Claudia
    Poch, Manel
    Cortes, Ulises
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 163 : 400 - +
  • [5] An argument-based approach to reasoning with clinical knowledge
    Gorogiannis, Nikos
    Hunter, Anthony
    Williams, Matthew
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2009, 51 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [6] An Argument-Based Approach to Using Multiple Ontologies
    Black, Elizabeth
    Hunter, Anthony
    Pan, Jeff Z.
    [J]. SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5785 : 68 - +
  • [7] A Dialectical Approach for Argument-Based Judgment Aggregation
    Caminada, Martin
    Booth, Richard
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 : 179 - 190
  • [8] An extensible argument-based ontology matching negotiation approach
    Maio, Paulo
    Silva, Nuno
    [J]. SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2014, 95 : 3 - 25
  • [9] A Bayesian Approach to Argument-Based Reasoning for Attack Estimation
    Kido, Hiroyuki
    Okamoto, Keishi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 249 - 255
  • [10] Assumptions in Alternate Assessment: An Argument-Based Approach to Validation
    Goldstein, Jessica
    Behuniak, Peter
    [J]. ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2011, 36 (03) : 179 - 191