Do we need to categorize it? Reflections on constituencies and quotas as tools for negotiating difference in the global food sovereignty convergence space
被引:13
|
作者:
Claeys, Priscilla
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Coventry Univ, Ctr Agroecol Water & Resilience, Coventry CV8 3LG, W Midlands, EnglandCoventry Univ, Ctr Agroecol Water & Resilience, Coventry CV8 3LG, W Midlands, England
Claeys, Priscilla
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Duncan, Jessica
[2
]
机构:
[1] Coventry Univ, Ctr Agroecol Water & Resilience, Coventry CV8 3LG, W Midlands, England
Convergence - as an objective and as a process - designates the coming together of different social actors across strategic, political, ideological, sectoral and geographic divides. In this paper, we analyze the global food sovereignty movement (GFSM) as a convergence space, with a focus on constituencies and quotas as tools to maintain diversity while facilitating convergence. We show how the use of constituencies and quotas has supported two objectives of the GFSM: alliances building and effective direct representation in global policy-making spaces. We conclude by pointing to some convergence challenges the GFSM faces as it expands beyond its agrarian origins.