Spatial memory training in a citizen science context

被引:8
|
作者
Palermo, Eduardo [1 ,3 ]
Laut, Jeffrey [1 ]
Nov, Oded [2 ]
Cappa, Paolo [1 ,3 ]
Porfiri, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Tandon Sch Engn, 6 Metrotech Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Technol Management & Innovat, Tandon Sch Engn, 6 Metrotech Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Affective state evaluation; Citizen science; Fetal alcohol syndrome; Intellectual disability; Spatial memory training; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; VIRTUAL-REALITY; ALCOHOL; CHILDREN; HYPERACTIVITY; EEG; REHABILITATION; ACQUISITION; PERFORMANCE; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Memory deficit is one of the primary effects of intellectual disability, and has a great impact on daily life. Here, we propose a novel spatial memory training system based on a citizen science virtual environment, in which users navigate an aquatic robot in a polluted canal and identify specific objects from images acquired by the robot. A portable low-cost electroencephalography device is utilized to enhance the degree of interactivity and enable real-time estimation of the affective state of the user. We involved a cohort of 60 healthy adult subjects to evaluate users' interest, memory performance, and affective variables as a function of navigation modality (active versus passive) and interface (a traditional computer mouse versus the headset). Despite offering a higher level of difficulty, the headset was preferred over a traditional mouse control by the users, whose spatial memory performance did not vary with the navigation modality or the interface. Active navigation was found to lead to a higher level of engagement, as measured by the headset. These findings suggest the possibility of a new, effective, and entertaining form of intellectual rehabilitation with potential impact on fetal alcohol syndrome. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gravitational lens modelling in a citizen science context
    Kueng, Rafael
    Saha, Prasenjit
    More, Anupreeta
    Baeten, Elisabeth
    Coles, Jonathan
    Cornen, Claude
    Macmillan, Christine
    Marshall, Phil
    More, Surhud
    Odermatt, Jonas
    Verma, Aprajita
    Wilcox, Julianne K.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 447 (03) : 2170 - 2180
  • [2] Can citizen science work? Perceptions of the role and utility of citizen science in a marine policy and management context
    Vann-Sander, Sarah
    Clifton, Julian
    Harvey, Euan
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 72 : 82 - 93
  • [4] Case Study: Citizen Science in Digital Humanities context
    Opryshko, Tetiana
    Nazarovets, Serhii
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF DIGITAL HUMANITIES WORKSHOP (DHW 2021), 2021, : 198 - 203
  • [5] Citizen, Science, and Citizen Science
    Fan, Fa-ti
    Chen, Shun-Ling
    [J]. EAST ASIAN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [6] Teacher Training in the Context of Open Science and Science Education
    Craciun, Dana
    Bunoiu, Madalin
    [J]. ELEARNING CHALLENGES AND NEW HORIZONS, VOL 4, 2018, : 319 - 326
  • [7] Visualization and Perception of Data Gaps in the Context of Citizen Science Projects
    Hoyer T.
    Moritz J.
    Moser J.
    [J]. KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information, 2021, 71 (3) : 155 - 172
  • [8] Data Sharing in the Context of Health-Related Citizen Science
    Majumder, Mary A.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2020, 48 (1_SUPPL): : 167 - 177
  • [9] Episodic memory for spatial context biases spatial attention
    Ciaramelli, Elisa
    Lin, Olivia
    Moscovitch, Morris
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 192 (03) : 511 - 520
  • [10] The Spatial Scaffold: The Effects of Spatial Context on Memory for Events
    Robin, Jessica
    Wynn, Jordana
    Moscovitch, Morris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (02) : 308 - 315