Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion

被引:40
|
作者
Morasch, MD
Collins, J
Pereles, FS
Carr, JC
Eskandari, MK
Pearce, WH
Finn, JP
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Div Vasc Surg, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2003.5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Standard lower extremity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (LE-CEMRA) with single injection bolus-chase methods on the basis of a single pelvis timing run can be accurate for depicting most vascular occlusive lesions but may fall short of catheter-based angiography when imaging tibial and pedal vessels. Magnetic resonance angiography techniques with a second contrast timing bolus and separate acquisitions for the calves and the pelvis greatly improve reliability and reduce venous contamination to levels that may render conventional angiography obsolete. Methods. From July to December 2001, 60 consecutive patients underwent LE-CEMRA of the calves with separate stepping-table acquisitions of the pelvis and thighs. Forty-five (75%) had complete or partial angiographic correlation during an endoluminal intervention or operative completion study. Lower extremity vessels were divided into anatomic segments (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, tibial-pedal) for review. Three blinded observers assessed magnetic resonance source partitions, maximum-intensity projections, and volume-rendered images. Disease per segment was graded from insignificant (< 20%) to occluded (100%) in 10% increments. Segments were also scored for venous contamination (scale, 0 to 3) and diagnostic quality (scale, 1 to 5). Digital subtraction angiograms were assessed similarly but separately. Results. The combination dual-timing/dual-injection technique had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99%, 97%, and 98%. Venous contamination and artifact were virtually eliminated with combined technique LE-CEMRA. Diagnostic quality of calf and foot vessels was significantly superior to conventional bolus-chase magnetic resonance techniques (P < .01). Conclusion: Hybrid dual-acquisition LE-CEMRA allows complete timing specification that consistently produces high-quality, artifact-free images of the calf and pedal vessels. These techniques may be accurate enough to replace conventional digital subtraction angiogram for evaluation of lower extremity vascular occlusive disease.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 70
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion - Discussion
    Brewster, DC
    Morasch, MD
    Taylor, LM
    Turnipseed, WD
    Bernhard, VM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (01) : 70 - 71
  • [2] Scoutless stepping-table peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Li, W
    Vu, AT
    Tutton, S
    Li, BSY
    Bejm, R
    Pierchala, L
    Edelman, RR
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [3] Cuff-compression of the proximal calf to reduce venous contamination in contrast-enhanced stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography
    Bilecen, D
    Jäger, KA
    Aschwanden, M
    Heidecker, HG
    Schulte, AC
    Bongartz, G
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (05) : 510 - 515
  • [4] Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: Hybrid peripheral MR angiography
    Pereles, FS
    Collins, JD
    Carr, JC
    Francois, C
    Morasch, MD
    McCarthy, RM
    Krupinski, EA
    Butler, GM
    Finn, JP
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (01) : 283 - 290
  • [5] Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity
    Krause, UJ
    Pabst, T
    Kenn, W
    Wittenberg, G
    Hahn, D
    ANGIOLOGY, 2004, 55 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [6] Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: Preliminary experience
    Meaney, JFM
    Ridgway, JP
    Chakraverty, S
    Robertson, I
    Kessel, D
    Radjenovic, A
    Kouwenhoven, M
    Kassner, A
    Smith, MA
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [7] Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast
    Erin K. Opfer
    Nathan S. Artz
    Grace S. Mitchell
    Sherwin S. Chan
    Pediatric Radiology, 2023, 53 : 1364 - 1379
  • [8] Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast
    Opfer, Erin K.
    Artz, Nathan S.
    Mitchell, Grace S.
    Chan, Sherwin S.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 53 (07) : 1364 - 1379
  • [9] A comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, contrast arteriography, and duplex arteriography for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization
    Hingorani, A
    Ascher, E
    Markevich, N
    Kallakuri, S
    Schutzer, R
    Yorkovich, W
    Jacob, T
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 18 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography in patients with lower extremity arterial disease
    Juhasz, Georgina
    Csore, Judit
    Suhai, Ferenc Imre
    Gyano, Marcell
    Pataki, Akos
    Vecsey-Nagy, Milan
    Pal, Daniel
    Fontanini, Daniele Mariastefano
    Berczi, Akos
    Csobay-Novak, Csaba
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2022, 163 (45) : 1782 - 1788