Structures of mutual obligation

被引:42
|
作者
Goodin, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Social Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S004727940200675X
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
'Mutual obligation' is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated intuitions about 'fair reciprocity' and the 'duty of fair play'. It seems an easy slide from those intuitions to 'mutual obligation' policies demanding work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are many different ways to structure mutual obligation. Workfare policies, such as the Howard government's 'Mutual Obligation Initiative' in Australia, pick out only one among many alternative regimes that would answer equally well to our root intuitions about 'fair reciprocity'. Other ways of structuring mutual obligations within social welfare policy are both more standard and more desirable.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:579 / 596
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条