Post-Disaster Infrastructure Delivery for Resilience

被引:14
|
作者
Chester, Mikhail [1 ]
El Asmar, Mounir [1 ]
Hayes, Samantha [2 ]
Desha, Cheryl [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Metis Ctr Infrastruct & Sustainable Engn, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Cities Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
post-disaster recovery; re-designing infrastructure; alternative project delivery methods; disaster resilience; stakeholder engagement; DISASTER RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; RECOVERY; MECHANISMS; BACK; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/su13063458
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As climate change increases the frequency and intensity of disasters and associated infrastructure damage, Alternative Project Delivery Methods are well positioned to enable innovative contracting and partnering methods for designing and delivering adaptation solutions that are more time- and cost-effective. However, where conventional "build-back-as-before" post-disaster reconstruction occurs, communities remain vulnerable to future disasters of similar or greater magnitude. In this conceptual paper, we draw on a variety of literature and emergent practices to present how such alternative delivery methods of reconstruction projects can systematically integrate "build-back-better" and introduce more resilient infrastructure outcomes. Considering existing knowledge regarding infrastructure resilience, post-disaster reconstruction and project delivery methods, we consider the resilience regimes of rebound, robustness, graceful extensibility, and sustained adaptability to present the potential for alternative project delivery methods to improve the agility and flexibility of infrastructure against future climate-related and other hazards. We discuss the criticality of continued pursuit of stakeholder engagement to support further improvements to project delivery methods, enabling new opportunities for engaging with a broader set of stakeholders, and for stakeholders to contribute new knowledge and insights to the design process. We conclude the significant potential for such methods to enable resilient infrastructure outcomes, through prioritizing resilience alongside time and cost. We also present a visual schematic in the form of a framework for enabling post-disaster infrastructure delivery for resilience outcomes, across different scales and timeframes of reconstruction. The findings have immediate implications for agencies managing disaster recovery efforts, offering decision-support for improving the adaptive capacity of infrastructure, the services they deliver, and capacities of the communities that rely on them.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A post-disaster resource allocation framework for improving resilience of interdependent infrastructure networks
    Sun, Jingran
    Zhang, Zhanmin
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 85 (85)
  • [2] POST-DISASTER RESILIENCE IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS
    Cherry, K. E.
    Garrison, M.
    Wilks, S.
    Jackson, E.
    Brigman, S.
    Sullivan, M.
    Broome, K.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 282 - 282
  • [3] A hierarchy of measures for infrastructure resilience - learning from post-disaster reconstruction in Christchurch, New Zealand
    MacAskill, Kristen
    Guthrie, Peter
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 32 (1-2) : 130 - 142
  • [4] Tracking the post-disaster evolution of water infrastructure resilience: A study of the 2021 Texas winter storm
    Tiedmann, Helena R.
    Spearing, Lauryn A.
    Castellanos, Sergio
    Stephens, Keri K.
    Sela, Lina
    Faust, Kasey M.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 91
  • [5] CAPACITY BUILDING FOR POST-DISASTER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT
    Haigh, Richard
    Amaratunga, Dilanthi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 13 (02) : 83 - 86
  • [6] Research on Disaster Resilience in Taiwan's Post-Disaster Tourist Areas
    Ouyang, Yu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE EURASIA CONFERENCE ON IOT, COMMUNICATION AND ENGINEERING (ECICE), 2019, : 216 - 219
  • [8] Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery
    Alexiuk, Erin
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2016, 53 (04) : 839 - 841
  • [9] Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery
    Wukich, Clayton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2013, 23 (04) : 1013 - 1019
  • [10] Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery
    Gill, Tom
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JAPAN JOURNAL, 2014, 17 (01) : 118 - 122