Influence of reinforcement parameters on the seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil retaining walls

被引:181
|
作者
El-Emam, Magdi M.
Bathurst, Richard J.
机构
[1] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Queens RMC, Geoengn Ctr, Dept Civil Engn, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Queens RMC, Geoengn Ctr, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
shaking table; reinforced soil; retaining wall; geosynthetic; seismic; l-g model;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The focus of the paper is on the influence of reinforcement design parameters (i.e. stiffness, length and vertical spacing) on the simulated earthquake response of reinforced soil retaining walls using reduced-scale model shaking table tests. A series of instrumented 1/6-scale model walls was constructed and dynamically loaded using a stepped-amplitude harmonic base acceleration record. The reinforcement design parameters investigated were found to have a significant effect on model response. Experimental results showed that the magnitude of accumulated facing lateral displacement under base excitation decreased with increasing reinforcement length, greater number of reinforcement layers and larger reinforcement stiffness. Significant down-drag forces at the back of the rigid facing were measured for all model configurations. However, the measured vertical load at the footing was not significantly influenced by changes in reinforcement parameters. The horizontal restrained (hinged) toe at the bottom of the rigid facing was shown to attract 30-60% of the total horizontal earth force depending on the reinforcement configuration. The magnitude and distribution of reinforcement connection loads was significantly affected by the reinforcement length, vertical spacing and stiffness. Measured footing loads, reinforcement connection loads and amplification factors are compared to values calculated using current practice in North America for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls and discrepancies between experimental results and design methods are identified. Implications of the physical test results to level of conservatism in current design practice are noted. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls
    El-Emam, M. M.
    Bathurst, R. J.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 12 (05) : 215 - 238
  • [2] Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls (vol 12, pg 215, 2005)
    El-Emam, M. M.
    Bathurst, R. J.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 12 (06) : 344 - 344
  • [3] Static response of reinforced soil retaining walls with nonuniform reinforcement
    Hatami, K.
    Bathurst, R.J.
    Di Pietro, P.
    [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2001, 1 (04) : 477 - 506
  • [4] Seismic Response of Rigid Faced Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls
    Bhattacharjee, Arup
    Krishna, A. Murali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 3 (02) : 1 - 14
  • [5] Seismic response of multi-tiered reinforced soil retaining walls
    Liu, Huabei
    Yang, Guangqing
    Ling, Hoe I.
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 61-62 : 1 - 12
  • [6] Influence of groundwater level changes on the seismic response of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Ren, Fei-fan
    Huang, Qiang-qiang
    Geng, Xue-yu
    Wang, Guan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2022, 23 (11): : 850 - 862
  • [7] Seismic response of reduced-scale modular block and rigid faced reinforced walls through shaking table tests
    Latha, G. Madhavi
    Santhanakumar, P.
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2015, 43 (04) : 307 - 316
  • [8] Seismic response of geosynthetic reinforced retaining walls
    Jesmani, Mehrab
    Kamalzare, Mehrad
    Sarbandi, Babak Bahrami
    [J]. GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 10 (05) : 635 - 655
  • [9] Reduced-scale geosynthetics retaining walls: deformation prediction by an expedited method
    Correia, Antonio Alberto S.
    Moita Pinto, Maria Isabel
    Monteiro, Katia D. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 22 (02) : 55 - 69
  • [10] Reduced scale shaking table tests on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls
    Guler, E.
    Selek, O.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 295 - 299