Ethical Naturalism and Moral Twin Earth

被引:4
|
作者
Viggiano, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Discipline Comunicaz, I-40122 Bologna, BO, Italy
关键词
Ethical naturalism; Moral disagreement; Moral realism; Open question argument; Theory of direct reference; Twin Earth;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-007-9094-2
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In order to rebut G. E. Moore's open question argument, ethical naturalists adopt a theory of direct reference for our moral terms. T. Horgan and M. Timmons have argued that this theory cannot be applied to moral terms, on the ground that it clashes with competent speakers' linguistic intuitions. While Putnam's Twin Earth thought experiment shows that our linguistic intuitions confirm the theory of direct reference, as applied to 'water', Horgan and Timmons devise a parallel thought experiment about moral terms, in order to show that this theory runs against our linguistic intuitions about such terms. My claim is that the Horgan-Timmons argument does not work. I concede that their thought experiment is a good way to test the applicability of the theory of direct reference to moral terms, and argue that the upshot of their experiment is not what they claim it is: our linguistic intuitions about Moral Twin Earth are parallel to, not different from, our intuitions about Twin Earth.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 224
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条