Self-efficacy expectations with regard to different tasks in smoking cessation

被引:45
|
作者
Dijkstra, A
de Vries, H
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Educ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
self efficacy; smoking cessation; precontemplators;
D O I
10.1080/08870440008402009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Self-efficacy expectations are important psychological determinants of smoking cessation. The present study aimed at exploring different sorts of self-efficacy. The following self-efficacy scales were composed: Emotional self-efficacy, Social self-efficacy, Skill self-efficacy, Relapse self-efficacy and Try self-efficacy. In a sample of 752 smokers with low motivation to quit, two subsequent self-report measurements of self-efficacy were conducted. Firstly, we investigated to what extent potential sources of self-efficacy - quitting history and smoking behavior were related to the types of self-efficacy. The explained variance in self-efficacy scores ranged from 4.4% to 23.1%, and in all five types of self-efficacy, smoking behaviour explained a higher percentage of self-efficacy than quitting history. The number of past quit attempts was only related to Relapse self-efficacy. Secondly, we investigated to what extent the different types of self-efficacy at T1 were predictive of quitting behavior measured at T2. The results showed that only Skill self-efficacy was predictive of quitting activity between T1 and T2. Point prevalence quitting at T2 was predicted by Skill self-efficacy and Relapse self-efficacy. The latter type of self-efficacy, however, was a negative predictor of quitting. The different types of self-efficacy can be mapped on two dimensions: The extent to which the means to accomplish a certain task are specified in the questionnaire item; and the phase of behavior change to which the self-efficacy tasks are relevant. Based on the findings from the predictive validity, it is concluded that the more clearly the means to accomplish the task are specified, the more valid the self-efficacy judgements are.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 511
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SELF-EFFICACY AND CESSATION OF SMOKING
    COELHO, RJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 54 (01) : 309 - 310
  • [2] SELF-EFFICACY AND RELAPSE IN SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS
    CONDIOTTE, MM
    LICHTENSTEIN, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 49 (05) : 648 - 658
  • [3] SELF-EFFICACY AS A PREDICTOR FOR THE CESSATION OF SMOKING - METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS
    MUDDE, AN
    KOK, G
    STRECHER, VJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1995, 10 (05) : 353 - 367
  • [4] SELF-EFFICACY, HEALTH LOCUS OF CONTROL, AND SMOKING CESSATION
    STUART, K
    BORLAND, R
    MCMURRAY, N
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1994, 19 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [5] Smoking cessation self-efficacy: Perspectives on structure and function
    Keenan, Nora K.
    Fuglestad, Paul T.
    Hertel, Andrew W.
    Baldwin, Austin S.
    Rothman, Alexander J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2008, 35 : S85 - S85
  • [6] Self-Efficacy and Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    Metrik, Jane
    Kahler, Christopher W.
    Shiffman, Saul
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2009, 23 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [7] SELF-EFFICACY AND RELAPSE IN SMOKING CESSATION - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION
    MCINTYRE, KO
    LICHTENSTEIN, E
    MERMELSTEIN, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 51 (04) : 632 - 633
  • [8] Depression and smoking cessation: The role of motivation and self-efficacy
    Haukkala, A
    Uutela, A
    Vartiainen, E
    McAlister, A
    Knekt, P
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2000, 25 (02) : 311 - 316
  • [9] Self-efficacy predicts the outcome of smoking cessation attempts
    Hayrumyan, V.
    Harutyunyan, A.
    Harutyunyan, T.
    [J]. TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2018, 16 : 195 - 195
  • [10] SELF-EFFICACY AND SMOKING CESSATION MAINTENANCE - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT
    DICLEMENTE, CC
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1981, 5 (02) : 175 - 187