Prognostic significance of the TNM-Staging-System of 1987 and 1997 as compared to the Robson-classification for renal cell cancer of 1969

被引:1
|
作者
Paul, R [1 ]
Kübler, H [1 ]
van Randenborgh, H [1 ]
Hartung, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Urol Klin & Poliklin, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
prognostic factor; TNM-staging system; Robson classification; renal cell cancer;
D O I
10.1055/s-2002-36163
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The TNM-Staging-Classification of 1987 was revised in 1997, the main difference being the increase in cut-off size from 2.5 to 7 cm for T1 and T2 tumors. The prognostic power of both TNM classification systems and the 1969 Robson staging system was evaluated based on our own patient material. Method: A total of 700 patients with renal cell cancer who had undergone radical tumor nephrectomy from 1983 to 1999 at our department were investigated. All cases were staged according to both TNM systems and the Robson classification. Follow-up was obtained from all patients and statistical analysis carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method, LogRank-test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The two versions of the TNM-system classified 247/700 (35.3%) patients differently in the T-category and 3/700 (0.4%) in the N-classification. Taken as a whole, the TNM-classifications provide statistically highly significant prognostic factors for renal cancer. The subgroup of patients with pT1 and pT2 tumors, however, demonstrated no significant statistical difference on the TNM-system from 1987 (p = 0.19), but we noted a statistically significant difference on the TNM-system from 1997 (p = 0.005) in regard to tumor progression after radical nephrectomy. If only patients with NO and MO status are included in our subgroup analysis of pT1 and pT2 tumors, which is equivalent to stage 1 patients on the Robson classification, we again do not find any prognostic difference using the earlier TNM-system (p = 0.39) but highly significant difference (p = 0.007) in the revised version. Kaplan-Meier analysis with LogRank-test for overall survival of patients with pT1 and pT2 tumors revealed no significant difference between the two TNM-versions. Conclusion: While both TNM-staging classification systems demonstrate a powerful prognostic significance in renal cell cancer. The 1997 TNM-system offers additional prognostic information for pT1 and pT2 tumors. Robson's simple staging system dating back to 1969 offers a similarly good estimation of risk in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Robson's reduced number of N-categories did not result in a loss of prognostic information. In fact, according to the analysis of our data, further simplification of the TNM-staging systems appears feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 539
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma -: Significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system
    Gettman, MT
    Blute, ML
    Spotts, B
    Bryant, SC
    Zincke, H
    [J]. CANCER, 2001, 91 (02) : 354 - 361
  • [2] Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma
    Javidan, J
    Stricker, HJ
    Tamboli, P
    Amin, MB
    Peabody, JO
    Deshpande, A
    Menon, M
    Amin, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04): : 1277 - 1281
  • [3] Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma
    Javidan, J
    Tamboli, P
    Amin, M
    Stricker, H
    Peabody, JO
    Deshpande, A
    Farah, RN
    Amin, MB
    Menon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 167 - 167
  • [4] MRI for preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma using the 1997 TNM classification: Comparison with surgical and pathologic staging
    Ergen, FB
    Hussain, HK
    Caoili, EM
    Korobkin, M
    Carlos, RC
    Weadock, WJ
    Johnson, TD
    Shah, R
    Hayasaka, S
    Francis, IR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (01) : 217 - 225
  • [5] Staging of renal cell carcinoma: 2010 TNM classification system and validation in Turkey
    Ozkan, Tayyar Alp
    Yildiz, Kursat
    Dillioglugil, Ozdal
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (03): : 206 - 211
  • [6] Reconsidering the prognostic significance of tumour deposit count in the TNM staging system for colorectal cancer
    Wang, Song
    Guan, Xu
    Ma, Mingfei
    Zhuang, Meng
    Ma, Tianyi
    Liu, Zheng
    Chen, Haipeng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Chen, Yinggang
    Wang, Guiyu
    Wang, Xishan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [7] Reconsidering the prognostic significance of tumour deposit count in the TNM staging system for colorectal cancer
    Song Wang
    Xu Guan
    Mingfei Ma
    Meng Zhuang
    Tianyi Ma
    Zheng Liu
    Haipeng Chen
    Zheng Jiang
    Yinggang Chen
    Guiyu Wang
    Xishan Wang
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [8] Renal cell carcinoma. Analysis of the prognostic significance of the TNM classification in comparison to Storkel's prognostic score
    Gunia, S
    May, M
    Korb, K
    Stosiek, P
    [J]. UROLOGE A, 2004, 43 (04): : 450 - +
  • [9] -Prognostic Significance of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio Compared to the TNM Classification in Stage III Gastric Cancer
    Gulmez, S.
    Senger, A. S.
    Uzun, O.
    Omeroglu, S.
    Ofluoglu, C.
    Sert, Z. O.
    Oz, A.
    Polat, E.
    Duman, M.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (11) : 1602 - 1608
  • [10] Significance of Tumor Size in Renal Cell Cancer with Perinephric Fat Infiltration Is TNM Staging System Adequate for Predicting Prognosis?
    Suer, Evren
    Baltaci, Sumer
    Burgu, Berk
    Aydogdu, Ozgu
    Gogus, Cagatay
    [J]. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (01) : 774 - 779