HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on "Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe"

被引:4
|
作者
Schlander, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] DKFZ, Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Inst Innovat & Valuat Hlth Care InnoValHC, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
Accountability for Reasonableness; Legitimacy; Cost-Effectiveness; Guidance; Social Preferences; Decision-Making; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; INCREMENTAL COST; NICE; ACCOUNTABILITY; REASONABLENESS; EXEMPLAR; SERVICES;
D O I
10.34172/ijhpm.2020.22
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There are at least two reasons why health technology assessment (HTA) agencies need to seek process-based solutions to support the legitimacy of healthcare resource allocation, ie, (i) in pluralistic societies, the existence of often conflicting and incommensurable claims (ie, the "fragmentation of value") and the lack of a broadly accepted, ethically defensible analytical framework, and (ii) the well-documented loopholes of the conventional logic of cost-effectiveness (CE) with its reductionist concept of allocative efficiency, which fails to reflect the distributive dimension of resource allocation decisions in collectively financed health schemes. Keywords: Accountability for Reasonableness, Legitimacy, Cost-Effectiveness, Guidance, Social Preferences, Decision-Making Copyright: (c) 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 161
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条