Biomechanical Comparison of an All-Inside Meniscal Repair Device Construct Versus Pullout Sutures for Arthroscopic Transtibial Repair of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Matched-Pair Cadaveric Study

被引:7
|
作者
Vertullo, Christopher J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Cadman, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Dabirrahmani, Dane [1 ,2 ]
Appleyard, Richard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Biomed Sci, Orthopaed Biomech Res Grp, Level 1,75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Knee Res Australia, Gold Coast, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Ctr Musculoskeletal Res, Menzies Hlth Inst, Gold Coast, Australia
关键词
meniscus root tear; biomechanical testing; pullout suture; root repair; all-inside meniscal repair device;
D O I
10.1177/23259671211000464
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Meniscus root repairs are important for restoring knee function after a complete meniscus root tear. Various suturing patterns have been proposed for the root repair. The 2-simple-stitches (TSS) method is currently the preferred technique, as it is simplest to perform and allows the least displacement of the meniscus root. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of a posterior medial meniscus transtibial root repair consisting of an all-inside meniscal repair device (AMRD) construct with the TSS pullout suture pattern. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten pairs of cadaveric medial menisci were prepared with 1 of the 2 constructs. The constructs were randomized between pairs. All constructs were subjected to preloading with 2 N for 10 seconds and then cyclic loading from 5 N to 20 N for 1000 cycles at a frequency of 0.5 Hz. Subsequently, the menisci were loaded to failure at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. All loads were applied in-line with the circumferential meniscal fibers near the posterior medial meniscal horn. Results: The mean yield load and stiffness were similar for both constructs. The elongation after cyclic loading was greater for the AMRD. The displacement at both yield load and ultimate failure were also higher for the AMRD. The ultimate failure load of the AMRD was also significantly higher. During load to failure, the mode of failure in the AMRD was heterogeneous. All the TSS constructs failed by suture cutout. Conclusion: Posterior medial meniscus root repairs using both the AMRD and TSS constructs have elongation under the biomechanically acceptable threshold of 3 mm. The stiffness and yield loads indicate similar mechanical properties of the constructs. However, the significantly higher elongation for the AMRD leaves the TSS method as the preferred option for transtibial repairs. Despite this, the AMRD construct may still represent a viable alternative to the TSS suture pattern, comparable to alternative suture patterns with similar limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside Versus Transtibial Meniscus Root Repair Techniques
    Pasic, Nicholas
    Storaci, Hunter
    Guzman, Roberto
    Debaun, Malcolm
    Maruyama, Masahiro
    Hall, Kimberly
    Salazar, Brett P.
    Dragoo, Jason L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (09): : 2366 - 2373
  • [2] Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Lee, Wonyoung
    Park, Jae-Young
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (05): : 1254 - 1261
  • [3] A comparison of the transtibial pullout technique and all-inside meniscal repair in medial meniscus posterior root tear: Prognostic factors and midterm clinical outcomes
    Dzidzishvili, Lika
    Isabel Lopez-Torres, Irene
    Saez, David
    Manuel Arguello, Jose
    Calvo, Emilio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 26 : 130 - 134
  • [4] Insufficient restoration of meniscal extrusion by transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears
    Takase, Ryota
    Ohsawa, Takashi
    Hashimoto, Shogo
    Kurihara, Shingo
    Yanagisawa, Shinya
    Hagiwara, Keiichi
    Kimura, Masashi
    Chikuda, Hirotaka
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2023, 31 (11) : 4895 - 4902
  • [5] Insufficient restoration of meniscal extrusion by transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears
    Ryota Takase
    Takashi Ohsawa
    Shogo Hashimoto
    Shingo Kurihara
    Shinya Yanagisawa
    Keiichi Hagiwara
    Masashi Kimura
    Hirotaka Chikuda
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 4895 - 4902
  • [6] Reprint of: Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Lee, Wonyoung
    Park, Jae-Young
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (06): : 1376 - 1383
  • [7] The role of MRI in evaluation of arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears
    de Oliveira, Camila Vilela
    Teixeira Lobo, Carlos Felipe
    Partezani Helito, Paulo Victor
    Bordalo-Rodrigues, Marcelo
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 77 : 158 - 168
  • [8] Regarding "Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears"
    Hsu, Jim C.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (09): : 1957 - 1957
  • [9] Weight loss enhances meniscal healing following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears
    Hiranaka, Takaaki
    Furumatsu, Takayuki
    Yokoyama, Yusuke
    Higashihara, Naohiro
    Tamura, Masanori
    Kawada, Koki
    Ozaki, Toshifumi
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024, 32 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [10] Arthroscopic all-inside repair for a tear of posterior root of the medial meniscus: a technical note
    Choi, Nam-Hong
    Son, Kyung-Mo
    Victoroff, Brian N.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (09) : 891 - 893