Point-of-care testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Yoon, S. H. [1 ]
Yang, S. [2 ]
Cho, H. [2 ]
Eun, S. [1 ]
Koo, C. M. [1 ]
Kim, M. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Diagnosis; Point-of-care test; Rapid test; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.26355/eurrev_202101_24422
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization (FDA-EUA) authorized point-of-care tests (POCTs) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published till August 10, 2020. We included studies providing information regarding diagnostic test accuracy of FDA-EUA POCTs for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The methodologic quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The review protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (protocol number CRD42020202248). RESULTS: We included 26 studies describing a total of 3242 samples. The summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.97] and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.991.00). A pooled analysis based on the index test revealed a summary sensitivity and specificity of Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 [0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1,00, respectively)] and ID NOW COV I D-19 [0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: FDA-EUA POCTs, especially molecular assays, have high sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting SARS-CoV-2. If approved, FDA-EUA POCTs can provide a rapid and practical way to identify infected individuals early on and help to limit the strain on the healthcare system. However, more high-quality clinical data are required to support our results.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 517
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smartphone-based point-of-care testing of the SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review
    Zayed, Berlanty A.
    Ali, Ahmed N.
    Elgebaly, Alaa A.
    Talaia, Nourhan M.
    Hamed, Mahmoud
    Mansour, Fotouh R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2023, 21
  • [2] Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Jimin
    Sung, Heungsup
    Lee, Hyukmin
    Kim, Jae-Seok
    Shin, Sue
    Jeong, Seri
    Choi, Miyoung
    Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (07):
  • [3] Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data
    Ricco, Matteo
    Ferraro, Pietro
    Gualerzi, Giovanni
    Ranzieri, Silvia
    Henry, Brandon Michael
    Ben Said, Younes
    Pyatigorskaya, Natalia Valeryevna
    Nevolina, Elena
    Wu, Jianhong
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    Signorelli, Carlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care tests for diagnosis of current SARS-CoV-2 infections in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fujita-Rohwerder, Naomi
    Beckmann, Lars
    Zens, Yvonne
    Verma, Arpana
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (05) : 274 - 287
  • [5] The diagnostic accuracy of saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Atieh, Momen A.
    Guirguis, Marina
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Cannon, Richard D.
    [J]. ORAL DISEASES, 2022, 28 : 2347 - 2361
  • [6] Scrub typhus point-of-care testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Saraswati, Kartika
    Day, Nicholas P. J.
    Mukaka, Mavuto
    Blacksell, Stuart D.
    [J]. PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2018, 12 (03):
  • [7] Point-of-care testing for tetanus immunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Low, Rachel
    Young, Kieron
    Verani, Lorenzo
    Cotton, Daniele T.
    Welman, Ted
    Moore, Luke S. P.
    Horwitz, Maxim D.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (10) : 771 - 778
  • [8] SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammadi, Abbas
    Esmaeilzadeh, Elmira
    Li, Yijia
    Bosch, Ronald J.
    Li, Jonathan Z.
    [J]. EBIOMEDICINE, 2020, 59
  • [9] Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tapari, Anastasia
    Braliou, Georgia G.
    Papaefthimiou, Maria
    Mavriki, Helen
    Kontou, Panagiota, I
    Nikolopoulos, Georgios K.
    Bagos, Pantelis G.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [10] Paper-Based Point-of-Care Testing of SARS-CoV-2
    Jia, Yuan
    Sun, Hao
    Tian, Jinpeng
    Song, Qiuming
    Zhang, Wenwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 9