Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Clinical outcomes with 1-year follow-up

被引:57
|
作者
Visser, Jacob J.
Bosch, Johanna L.
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
van Dijk, Lukas C.
Hendriks, Johanna M.
Poldermans, Don
van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Surg, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.018
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of treatment after endovascular repair and open surgery in patients with ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), including 1-year follow-up. Methods: All consecutive conscious patients with ruptured infrarenal AAAs who presented to our tertiary care teaching hospital between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, were included in this study (n = 55). Twenty-six patients underwent endovascular repair, and 29 patients underwent open surgery. Patients who were hemodynamically too unstable to undergo a computed tomography angiography scan were excluded. Outcomes evaluated were intraoperative mortality, 30-day mortality, systemic complications, complications necessitating surgical intervention, and mortality and complications during 1-year follow-up. The statistical tests we used were the Student t test, chi(2) test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test (two sided; alpha = .05). Results. Thirty-day mortality was 8 (31%) of 26 patients who underwent endovascular repair and 9 (31%) of 29 patients who underwent open surgery (P =.98). Systemic complications and complications necessitating surgical intervention during the initial hospital stay were similar in both treatment groups (8/26 [31%] and 5/26 [19%] for endovascular repair, respectively, and 9/29 [31%] and 8/29 [28%] for open surgery, respectively; P > .40). During 1-year follow-up, two patients initially treated with enclovascular repair died as a result of non-aneurysm-related causes; no death occurred in the open surgery group. Complications during 1-year follow-up were 1 (5%) of 20 for endovascular repair and 4 (16%) of 25 for open surgery (P = .36). Conclusions. On the basis of our study with a highly selected population, the mortality and complication rates after endovascular repair may be similar compared with those after open surgery in patients treated for ruptured infrarenal AAAs.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1155
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Clinical outcomes with 1-year follow-up (vol 44, pg 1140, 2006)
    Coppi, G.
    Silingardi, R.
    Gennai, S.
    Saitta, G.
    Ciardullo, A., V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 45 (02) : 441 - 441
  • [2] Acute abdominal aortic aneurysms: Cost analysis of endovascular repair and open surgery in hemodynamically stable patients with 1-year follow-up
    Visser, Jacob J.
    van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Redekop, W. Ken
    van Dijk, Lukas C.
    Hendriks, Johanna M.
    Bosch, Johanna L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (03) : 681 - 689
  • [3] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Mureebe, Leila
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (05) : 1249 - 1257
  • [4] A Comparison of Open Surgery Versus Endovascular Repair of "Unstable" Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Gupta, Prateek K.
    Ramanan, Bala
    Engelbert, Travis L.
    Tefera, Girma
    Hoch, John R.
    Kent, K. Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (05) : 36S - 37S
  • [5] A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Gupta, Prateek K.
    Ramanan, Bala
    Engelbert, Travis L.
    Tefera, Girma
    Hoch, John R.
    Kent, K. Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (06) : 1439 - 1445
  • [6] Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients in the treatment of the ruptured of aneurysms abdominal
    Novo Martinez, Gloria Maria
    Ballesteros Pomar, Marta
    Menendez Sanchez, Elena
    Santos Alcantara, Eliezer
    Rodriguez Fernandez, Ines
    Zorita Calvo, Andres Manuel
    [J]. CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2017, 95 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [7] Outcomes of endovascular and open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in elderly patients
    Tan, Tze-Woei
    Eslami, Mohammad
    Rybin, Denis
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Zhang, Wayne W.
    Farber, Alik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 66 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [8] Endovascular or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Reinecke, Holger
    Donas, Konstantinos P.
    [J]. VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 45 (04) : 342 - 342
  • [9] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Endovascular repair versus open surgery-systematic review
    Visser, Jacob J.
    van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
    Hamza, Taye H.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Bosch, Johanna L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) : 122 - 129
  • [10] Open Surgery versus Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
    Jonker, Frederik H.
    Verhagen, Hence J.
    Lin, Peter H.
    Heijmen, Robin H.
    Trimarchi, Santi
    Lee, Anthony W.
    Moll, Frans L.
    Atamneh, Husam
    Rampoldi, Vincenzo
    Muhs, Bart E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 99S - 99S