ON THE STABILITY OF A TURBULENT NON-PREMIXED METHANE FLAME

被引:13
|
作者
Iyogun, C. O. [1 ]
Birouk, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Blowout; Co-flow; Flame length; LDV; Liftoff; Non-premixed flame; Swirl; NATURAL-GAS FLAMES; JET DIFFUSION FLAMES; SUDDEN EXPANSION; SWIRLING JET; NOZZLES; AIR; RECIRCULATION; BEHAVIOR; GEOMETRY;
D O I
10.1080/00102200903182742
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents an experimental qualitative assessment of the stability of a turbulent, non-premixed methane flame. The burner consists of a central fuel nozzle surrounded by an annulus of co-airflow with varying swirl strength. Two distinct nozzle geometries having similar exit cross-sectional areas but different internallorifice geometry-a rectangular and a contracted circular nozzle-were tested. They are referred to in this paper as RN and CCN, respectively. The main focus of the present study was on determining the flame liftoff and blowout velocities as well as the liftoff height and flame length, all of which can be used as indicators of the stability of non-premixed methane flame. The experimental data revealed that the blowout velocity of the RN nozzle's flame is remarkably higher than that of the CCN nozzle, and the liftoff velocity of the CCN is only slightly higher than that of the RN nozzle for identical swirl strength. In addition, the flame length of the RN nozzle is overall shorter than that of the CCN nozzle for identical test conditions, and the liftoff height of the CCN flame is higher than that of the RN flame. LDV velocity measurements were performed to determine the reacting flow overall dynamic along the centerline plane for typical jet and co-flow exit velocities. These results aimed at helping to explain the difference in flame stability between the two different nozzles' geometries in conjunction with the co-flow swirl strength.
引用
收藏
页码:1443 / 1463
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computational and experimental investigation of a turbulent non-premixed methane flame
    Nau, M
    Neef, W
    Maas, U
    Gutheil, E
    Warnatz, J
    [J]. TWENTY-SIXTH SYMPOSIUM (INTERNATIONAL) ON COMBUSTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 83 - 89
  • [2] A comparison of turbulent dimethyl ether and methane non-premixed flame structure
    Gabet, Kathryn N.
    Shen, Han
    Patton, Randy A.
    Fuest, Frederik
    Sutton, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2013, 34 : 1447 - 1454
  • [3] NO formation analysis of turbulent non-premixed coaxial methane/air diffusion flame
    Poozesh, S.
    Akafuah, N.
    Saito, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 13 (02) : 513 - 518
  • [4] NO formation analysis of turbulent non-premixed coaxial methane/air diffusion flame
    S. Poozesh
    N. Akafuah
    K. Saito
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 13 : 513 - 518
  • [5] Analysis of the filtered non-premixed turbulent flame
    Wang, Lipo
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2017, 175 : 259 - 269
  • [6] On the stability of a turbulent non-premixed biogas flame: Effect of low swirl strength
    Saediamiri, Meghdad
    Birouk, Madjid
    Kozinski, Janusz A.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2014, 161 (05) : 1326 - 1336
  • [7] Effect of Impingement Angle on Flame Stability in a Non-Premixed Methane/Oxygen Diffusion Flame Burner
    Ianuzzi, M. L. L.
    Hollingshead, J. M.
    Risha, A. C.
    Moore, J. D.
    Risha, G. A.
    [J]. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [8] STUDY OF A NON-PREMIXED METHANE / AIR PILOT FLAME
    El Khalil, Bendadi Mohammed
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2022 POWER CONFERENCE, POWER2022, 2022,
  • [9] Attachment structure of a non-premixed laminar methane flame
    Ikeda, Y
    Beduneau, JL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2005, 30 : 391 - 398
  • [10] Flamelet LES of a turbulent non-premixed cool flame
    Xiong, Guoqiang
    Li, Gesheng
    Zeng, Weilin
    Liang, Junjie
    [J]. FUEL, 2023, 342