Reading Level of Online Patient Education Materials From Major Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies

被引:15
|
作者
Fahimuddin, Fatimah Z. [1 ]
Sidhu, Sanam [1 ]
Agrawal, Anubhav [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Fresno Med Educ Program, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 155 N Fresno St, Fresno, CA 93701 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2019年 / 133卷 / 05期
关键词
HEALTH LITERACY; READABILITY ASSESSMENT; CANCER INFORMATION; AMERICAN ACADEMY; QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000003214
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the readability of online patient education materials provided by eight nationally recognized obstetrics and gynecology societies is in accordance with the recommended 6th-grade reading level outlined by the American Medical Association, National Institute of Health, and United States Department of Health and Human Services. METHODS: An analysis of 410 online patient education materials from the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the American Urogynecologic Society, the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and Voices for Pelvic Floor Disorders was completed, and the readability scores using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Scale, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook readability scales were calculated. These scales are used to assess print and web-based written material across a wide range of medical specialties and are endorsed by the National Institutes of Health. All four scales are computer-based assessments of readability that consider word count, number of syllables, and length of sentences when calculating a score that corresponds to grade level. RESULTS: Majority of the patient education materials across all eight obstetrics and gynecology societies had readability scores above the recommended 6th-grade reading level. The average reading level for the 69 obstetrics-related articles ranged from 9th to 12th grade. The mean grade level for the 341 gynecology articles had a similar range across the four readability scales. CONCLUSION: Online patient education materials provided by major obstetrics and gynecology societies do not currently adhere to recommended readability guidelines. Continued efforts to provide accessible and informative patient education materials is recommended to help improve health literacy for women.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 993
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies
    Fahimuddin, Fatimah Z.
    Sidhu, Sanam
    Agrawal, Anubhav
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 174S - 175S
  • [2] Readability of online patient materials from major obstetrics organizations
    Sperling, Jeffrey D.
    Siegel, Molly
    Shulman, Rachel
    Gonzalez, Juan M.
    Zlatnik, Marya G.
    Gossett, Dana R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S383 - S383
  • [3] Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations
    Nattam, Anunita
    Vithala, Tripura
    Wu, Tzu-Chun
    Bindhu, Shwetha
    Bond, Gregory
    Liu, Hexuan
    Thompson, Amy
    Wu, Danny T. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [4] Naloxone Online Information Exceeds the Recommended Reading Level for Patient Education Materials
    Dang, Nhu
    Khunte, Mihir
    Zhong, Anthony
    Chatterjee, Avik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, 2023, 84 (05) : 680 - 683
  • [5] Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials From Major Ophthalmologic Associations
    Huang, Grace
    Fang, Christina H.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Bhagat, Neelakshi
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Langer, Paul D.
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 133 (04) : 449 - 454
  • [6] Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Provided by Major Gynecological Societies
    Nwachuku, Nneoma
    Carson, TreChelle
    Fahimuddin, Fatimah
    Samuel, Memorie
    Mitchell, Rochanda
    McDonald, Vanessa
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 6S - 6S
  • [7] Readability Assessment of Online Obstetrics and Gynecology Patient-Oriented Literature
    Richards, Elliott
    Trinidad, Mari Charisse
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 153S - 153S
  • [8] Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies
    Hanci, Volkan
    Otlu, Buesra
    Biyikoglu, Ali Salih
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (02) : e47 - e57
  • [9] Reading level and readability of patient education materials in mental health
    Adkins A.D.
    Singh N.N.
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2001, 10 (1) : 1 - 8
  • [10] Readability of online patient education materials on gynecologic malignancies from major medical associations
    Samuel, D.
    Vilardo, N.
    Isani, S.
    Gressel, G. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 124 - 125