Development and Content Validity of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Home Dialysis

被引:18
|
作者
Rivara, Matthew B. [1 ,2 ]
Edwards, Todd [3 ]
Patrick, Donald [3 ]
Anderson, Lisa [1 ]
Himmelfarb, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Mehrotra, Rajnish [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Kidney Res Inst, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
end stage kidney disease; peritoneal dialysis; hemodialysis;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.15570920
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives The population of patients with kidney failure in theUnited States using home dialysis modalities is growing rapidly. Unlike for in-center hemodialysis, there is no patient-reported experiencemeasure for assessment of patient experience of care for peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis. We sought to develop and establish content validity of a patient-reported experience measure for patients undergoing home dialysis using a mixed methods multiple stakeholder approach. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We conducted a structured literature review, followed by concept elicitation focus groups and interviews among 65 participants, including 21 patients on home dialysis, 33 home dialysis nurses, three patient care partners, and eight nephrologists. We generated a list of candidate items for possible measure inclusion and conducted a national prioritization exercise among 91 patients on home dialysis and 39 providers using a web-based platform. We drafted the Home Dialysis Care Experience instrument and conducted cognitive debriefing interviews to evaluate item interpretability, order, and structure. We iteratively refined the measure on the basis of interview findings. Results The literature review and concept elicitation phases supported 15 domains of home dialysis care experience in six areas: communication and education of patients, concern and helpfulness of the care team, proficiency of the care team, patient-centered care, care coordination, and amenities and environment. Focus groups results showed that domains of highest importance for measure inclusion were patient education and communication, care coordination, and personalization of care. Prioritization exercise results confirmed focus group findings. Cognitive debriefing indicated that the finalmeasurewas easily understood and supported content validity. Conclusions TheHomeDialysis Care Experience instrument is a 26-itempatient-reported experiencemeasure for use in peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis. The Home Dialysis Care Experience instrument represents the first rigorously developed and content-valid English-language instrument for assessment of patient-reported experience of care in home dialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 598
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation and Measurement Properties of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Home Dialysis
    Rivara, Matthew B.
    Prince, David K.
    Leuther, Kerstin K.
    Hussein, Wael F.
    Mehrotra, Rajnish
    Edwards, Todd
    Schiller, Brigitte
    Patrick, Donald L.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 19 (05): : 602 - 609
  • [2] Evaluation and Measurement Properties of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Home Dialysis
    Rivara, Matthew B.
    Prince, David K.
    Leuther, Kerstin
    Hussein, Wael F.
    Schiller, Brigitte
    Mehrotra, Rajnish
    Edwards, Todd C.
    Patrick, Donald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 322 - 322
  • [3] Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
    Flythe, Jennifer E.
    Dorough, Adeline
    Narendra, Julia H.
    Wingard, Rebecca L.
    Dalrymple, Lorien S.
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01) : 253 - 265
  • [4] Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
    Jennifer E. Flythe
    Adeline Dorough
    Julia H. Narendra
    Rebecca L. Wingard
    Lorien S. Dalrymple
    Darren A. DeWalt
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 253 - 265
  • [5] Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS)
    Rosvall, Annica
    Axelsson, Malin
    Toth, Ervin
    Kumlien, Christine
    Gershater, Magdalena Annersten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [6] Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability
    Allvin, Renee
    Ehnfors, Margareta
    Rawal, Narinder
    Svensson, Elisabeth
    Idvall, Ewa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (03) : 411 - 419
  • [7] Content validity of a patient-reported experience measure (CQRA-PREM) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Portugal
    Rainho, R.
    Oliveira, D.
    Bernardes, M.
    Costa, L.
    Vaz, C.
    Fonseca, J. A.
    Jacome, C.
    [J]. ARP RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 2 (03): : 217 - 227
  • [8] The Responsiveness, Content Validity, and Convergent Validity of the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    Jolliffe, Rachel
    Seers, Helen
    Jackson, Sarah
    Caro, Elena
    Weeks, Laura
    Polley, Marie J.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2015, 14 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [9] Establishing the content validity of a new emergency department patient-reported experience measure (ED PREM): a Delphi study
    Claudia Bull
    Julia Crilly
    Sharon Latimer
    Brigid M. Gillespie
    [J]. BMC Emergency Medicine, 22
  • [10] Establishing the content validity of a new emergency department patient-reported experience measure (ED PREM): a Delphi study
    Bull, Claudia
    Crilly, Julia
    Latimer, Sharon
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    [J]. BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)