Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

被引:97
|
作者
Zuberbier, T. [1 ]
Oanta, A. [2 ]
Bogacka, E. [3 ]
Medina, I. [4 ]
Wesel, F. [5 ]
Uhl, P. [6 ]
Antepara, I. [7 ]
Jauregui, I. [7 ]
Valiente, R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Allergie Ctr Charite, Dept Dermatol & Allergy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] SC Dermamed SRL, Brasov, Romania
[3] NZOZ Mat Med, Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Ctr Med Vitae, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Cabinet Allergol, Nantes, France
[6] Arzt Haut u Geschlechlskrankheiten Allergol, Berlin, Germany
[7] Hosp Basurto, Serv Alergol, Bilbao, Spain
[8] FAES FARMA SA, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
bilastine; chronic idiopathic urticaria; Dermatology Life Quality Index; H(1)antihistamine; total symptoms score; LIFE QUALITY INDEX; EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF GUIDELINE; DESLORATADINE; MANAGEMENT; CETIRIZINE; PARALLEL; POTENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02217.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
P>Background: Bilastine is a novel nonsedative H-1-receptor antagonist, which may be used for the symptomatic treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CU). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg and placebo in CU patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms. Methods: Overall 525 male and female subjects aged 18-70 years were randomized to receive bilastine 20 mg, levocetirizine 5 mg or placebo, once daily for 28 days, in double-blind manner, in 46 centres across Europe and Argentina. Patients rated symptoms of pruritus, number of wheals, and maximum size of wheals (on predefined scales) as reflective (over past 12 h) symptoms twice daily, for assessment of change from baseline in the total symptoms scores (TSS) over 28 days as the primary efficacy measure. Changes in reflective and instantaneous symptoms scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and CU-associated discomfort and sleep disturbance were assessed as secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests and electrocardiograms. Results: Bilastine reduced patients' mean reflective and instantaneous TSS from baseline to a significantly greater degree than placebo (P < 0.001); from day 2 onwards of treatment. The DLQI, general discomfort, and sleep disruption were also improved significantly in bilastine-treated patients as compared with placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001 for all parameters). Comparison with levocetirizine indicated both treatments to be equally efficacious as well as equally safe and well tolerated as compared with placebo. Conclusions: Bilastine 20 mg is a novel effective and safe treatment option for the management of CU.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 528
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: A double-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial
    Podder, Indrashis
    Das, Anupam
    Ghosh, Shouvik
    Biswas, Debalina
    Sengupta, Sujata
    Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2020, 33 (06)
  • [2] Levocetirizine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Nettis, E
    Colanardi, MC
    Barra, L
    Ferrannini, A
    Vacca, A
    Tursi, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 154 (03) : 533 - 538
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of desloratadine 5 mg once daily in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Monroe, E
    Finn, A
    Patel, P
    Guerrero, R
    Ratner, P
    Bernstein, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 48 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [4] Effectiveness and safety of levocetirizine 10 mg versus a combination of levocetirizine 5 mg and montelukast 10 mg in chronic urticaria resistant to levocetirizine 5 mg: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Sarkar, Tushar Kanti
    Sil, Amrita
    Pal, Santasmita
    Ghosh, Chinmoy
    Das, Nilay Kanti
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2017, 83 (05): : 561 - 568
  • [5] Rupatadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre study
    Gimenez-Arnau, A.
    Pujol, R. M.
    Ianosi, S.
    Kaszuba, A.
    Malbran, A.
    Poop, G.
    Donado, E.
    Perez, I.
    Izquierdo, I.
    Arnaiz, E.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2007, 62 (05) : 539 - 546
  • [6] A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group pilot study to compare the efficacy and sedative effects of desloratadine 5 mg with levocetirizine 5 mg in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria
    Hong, Jin-Bon
    Lee, Hsing-Chuan
    Hu, Fu-Chang
    Chu, Chia-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 63 (05) : E100 - E102
  • [7] Levocetirizine is an effective treatment in patients suffering from chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter study
    Kapp, A
    Pichler, WJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (04) : 469 - 474
  • [8] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vortioxetine 10 mg and 20 mg in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
    Jacobsen, Paula L.
    Mahableshwarkar, Atul R.
    Serenko, Michael
    Chan, Serena
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 76 (05) : 575 - 582
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial
    Ortonne, Jean-Paul
    Grob, Jean-Jacques
    Auquier, Pascal
    Dreyfus, Isabelle
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [10] Cyclosporine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Vena, Gino A.
    Cassano, Nicoletta
    Colombo, Delia
    Pcruzzi, Elena
    Pigatto, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 55 (04) : 705 - 709