HOW SUCCESSFUL ARE MEMBER STATES WHEN FOLLOWING EU COHESION POLICY PRIORITIES? FOCUS ON THE VISEGRAD FOUR COUNTRIES

被引:1
|
作者
Plesivcak, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Econ & Social Geog, Demog & Terr Dev, Ilkovicova 6, Bratislava 84215 4, Slovakia
来源
关键词
EU cohesion policy; Europe; 2020; Strategy; member states; Visegrad Four; TOPSIS method; EUROPEAN STRUCTURAL FUNDS; REGIONAL POLICY; GROWTH; CONVERGENCE; IMPACT; INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.31577/geogrcas.2020.72.1.03
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The study aims to assess the territorial context of EU cohesion policy implementation at the member state level following the Europe 2020 indicators. Special attention is paid to the Visegrad Four countries. The TOPSIS multi-criterion assessment method was used to monitor the progress of the EU member states in three key priorities (smart, sustainable and inclusive growth), but also globally in the context of cohesion policy as such. We concentrate on the cross-cutting years representing the period of the global economic and financial crisis (2010) as well as the post-crisis situation (2015) - the start and the midway point of achieving the Europe 2020 targets. The analysis has produced results confirming that the member states that joined the EU after 2004 have experienced different progress in the areas under consideration. Nevertheless, in assessing achievement in cohesion policy as a whole, they were ranked among the EU's most successful nations, of V4 countries especially Poland and Slovakia. This confirms the meaningfulness of the EU cohesion policy which should help new member state to catch up with the more developed ones.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 69
页数:19
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] EU Cohesion and Its Evaluation in the Case of Visegrad Four Countries
    Melecky, Lukas
    Skokan, Karel
    [J]. LIBEREC ECONOMIC FORUM 2011, 2011, : 314 - 326
  • [2] The role of EU cohesion policy in promoting smart and sustainable competitiveness in the regions of the Visegrad countries
    Dziembala, Malgorzata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (03) : 325 - 341
  • [3] RATING OF INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AND COMPETITIVENESS OF THE VISEGRAD FOUR IN COMPARISON WITH THE EU MEMBER STATES
    Bartalosova, Erika
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE FINANCE AND RISK 2015, VOL 1, 2015, : 48 - 58
  • [4] Tax Capacity and Tax Effort in Visegrad Group Countries and in Old Member EU States
    Kroupova, Zdenka Zakova
    Slaboch, Josef
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC FINANCE 2015, 2015, : 302 - 307
  • [5] REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF NEW EU MEMBER STATES IN THE CONTEXT OF COHESION POLICY
    Viturka, Milan
    Zitek, Vladimir
    Klimova, Viktorie
    Tonev, Petr
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 9 (02) : 71 - 90
  • [6] Cohesion Policy Spending in the New Member States of the EU in an Endogenous Growth Model
    Varga, Janos
    in 't Veld, Jan
    [J]. EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 49 (05) : 29 - 54
  • [7] Realization of the EU's Cohesion Policy in Health Care in the Visegrad Group Countries in the Perspective 2014-2020
    Holecki, Tomasz
    Kowalska-Bobko, Iwona
    Fraczkiewicz-Wronka, Aldona
    Wegrzyn, Maria
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
  • [8] Towards an ever "closer" union? Refugee Policy and Social Cohesion in Eastern EU Member States
    Tawat, Mahama
    [J]. EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2016, 32 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [9] Territorial revisions to increase cohesion policy funding from the EU: the case of the new member states
    Zdrazil, Pavel
    Kraftova, Ivana
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2023, 23 (02) : 142 - 161
  • [10] EU Cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of Structural Funds in the new member states
    Bachtler, John
    McMaster, Irene
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2008, 26 (02): : 398 - 427