Animal ethics committees and the implementation of the Three RS

被引:0
|
作者
Yates, R
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In Australia, the use of animals in research, teaching and diagnostics is governed by the legislation of the State or Territory (the relevant legislation in South Australia is the ''Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1985'') and the code of practice set down by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). The responsibility for fulfilling the requirements of both the legislation and the code of practice lies with the institution through its animal experimentation and ethics committee (AEC). The composition of the AEC is determined by the code of practice and has as its members representatives from the areas of animal welfare, veterinary science, research, the general public and the daily care of research animals. In carrying out the delegated responsibility, the AEC (local designation, Animal Welfare Committee) at Flinders University has developed a two tiered system of examination and evaluation of projects involving animals. This system involves the use of a subcommittee from each of the two schools which use animals in experimentation. The subcommittees perform a critical appraisal of each project and rank the procedures according to the NHMRC category of procedures and the State government pain categories. The ranking of procedures enables the central committee (AWC) to focus on protocols which are contentious or have the potential to cause undue pain or stress to the animal. The subcommittee of the School of Medicine has been largely responsible for the development of this system, and has evolved a rigorous assessment mechanism which guides chief investigators to address all the issues associated with animal experimentation and their specific research protocols. The product forwarded to the AWC enables it to make its judgements in the most informed way. This system goes a long way to ensuring that each project is refined, that the use of alternatives has been investigated, and that the numbers of animals requested are appropriate for the study.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 371
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANIMAL ETHICS COMMITTEES
    ANDERSON, WP
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (01): : 157 - 157
  • [2] Ethics committees: how do they contribute to the Three RS? Synopsis of the workshop
    Johnston, NE
    Rusche, B
    [J]. ANIMAL ALTERNATIVES, WELFARE, AND ETHICS, 1997, 27 : 391 - 395
  • [3] The interpretation and application of the Three Rs by Animal Ethics Committee members
    Schuppli, CA
    Fraser, D
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2005, 33 (05): : 487 - 500
  • [4] Māori Concepts in Animal Ethics: Implications for the Three Rs
    Stewart, Georgina Tuari
    Birdsall, Sally
    [J]. ANTHROZOOS, 2024,
  • [5] ETHICS, ETHICAL COMMITTEES AND ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
    BRITT, D
    [J]. NATURE, 1984, 311 (5986) : 503 - 506
  • [6] Local ethics committees for animal experimentation
    Puget, A
    [J]. THERAPIE, 2004, 59 (01): : 57 - 59
  • [7] Local ethics committees for animal experimentation
    Mroczkowski, Slawomir
    Frieske, Anna
    [J]. MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA, 2013, 69 (06) : 353 - 357
  • [8] ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION: ETHICS COMMITTEES IN 2008
    Verschuere, Bruno
    [J]. BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE VETERINAIRE DE FRANCE, 2008, 161 (05): : 399 - 402
  • [9] The role of veterinarians on animal experimentation ethics committees
    Scott, LR
    Carter, PD
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1996, 74 (04) : 309 - 311
  • [10] Animal ethics committees of veterinary schools in Turkey
    Yasar, A.
    Ozturk, R.
    Ozen, A.
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 83 (05): : 504 - 506