Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Canning, Angie [1 ]
Clarke, Sally [2 ]
Thorning, Sarah [3 ]
Chauhan, Manbir [4 ]
Weir, Kelly A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Gold Coast Hlth, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Speech Pathol, Gold Coast, Australia
[2] Childrens Hlth Queensland, Queensland Childrens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Gold Coast Hlth, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Lib Serv, Gold Cost, Australia
[4] Gold Coast Hlth, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Newborn Care Unit, Gold Coast, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Allied Hlth Sci, Gold Coast, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia
[7] Allied Hlth Res Gold Coast Hlth, Gold Coast, Australia
关键词
Oral feeding; nCPAP; HFNC; Pediatric; Swallowing;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review was to determine whether introduction of oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support facilitates achievement of full oral feeding without adverse effects, compared to no oral feeding (NPO; nil per oral) on CPAP or HFNC.MethodsA protocol was lodged with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and AustHealth from database inception to 10th June 2020. Study population included children (preterm to <18years) on nCPAP or HFNC who were orally feeding. Primary outcomes included full or partial oral feeding and oropharyngeal aspiration. Secondary outcomes examined adverse events including clinical signs of aspiration, aspiration pneumonia and deterioration in respiratory status.ResultsThe search retrieved 1684 studies following duplicate removal. Title and abstract screening identified 70 studies for full text screening and of these, 16 were included in the review for data extraction. Methods of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) included nCPAP (n=6), nCPAP and HFNC (n=5) and HFNC (n=5). A metanalysis was not possible as respiratory modes and cohorts were not comparable. Eleven studies reported on adverse events. Oral feeding safety was predominantly based on retrospective data from chart entries and clinical signs, with only one study using an instrumental swallow evaluation (VFSS) to determine aspiration status.ConclusionsFindings are insufficient to conclude whether commencing oral feeding whilst on nCPAP or HFNC facilitates transition to full oral feeding without adverse effects, including oropharyngeal aspiration. Further research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of oral feeding on CPAP and HFNC for infants and children.Trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42016039325.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review
    Angie Canning
    Sally Clarke
    Sarah Thorning
    Manbir Chauhan
    Kelly A Weir
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 21
  • [2] Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice
    Angie Canning
    Rachael Fairhurst
    Manbir Chauhan
    Kelly A. Weir
    [J]. Dysphagia, 2020, 35 : 443 - 454
  • [3] Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice
    Canning, Angie
    Fairhurst, Rachael
    Chauhan, Manbir
    Weir, Kelly A.
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2020, 35 (03) : 443 - 454
  • [4] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen and nasal continuous positive airway pressure and full oral feeding in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
    Shetty, Sandeep
    Hunt, Katie
    Douthwaite, Amy
    Athanasiou, Maria
    Hickey, Ann
    Greenough, Anne
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2016, 101 (05): : F408 - F411
  • [5] High Flow Nasal Cannula for Weaning Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Balhareth, Yasser
    Razak, Abdul
    [J]. NEONATOLOGY, 2024, 121 (03) : 359 - 369
  • [6] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High-Flow Nasal Cannula?
    Ramanathan, R.
    Biniwale, M.
    [J]. NEONATOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) : 268 - 269
  • [7] Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure
    B E de Jongh
    R Locke
    A Mackley
    J Emberger
    D Bostick
    J Stefano
    E Rodriguez
    T H Shaffer
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2014, 34 : 27 - 32
  • [8] Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure
    de Jongh, B. E.
    Locke, R.
    Mackley, A.
    Emberger, J.
    Bostick, D.
    Stefano, J.
    Rodriguez, E.
    Shaffer, T. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [9] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Today
    Dani, Carlo
    [J]. CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04) : 711 - 724
  • [10] High-flow nasal cannula for children not compliant with continuous positive airway pressure
    Amaddeo, Alessandro
    Khirani, Sonia
    Frapin, Annick
    Teng, Theo
    Griffon, Lucie
    Fauroux, Brigitte
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2019, 63 : 24 - 28