Comparative Study of Different Drive Controller for a Traction System

被引:0
|
作者
Yhya, Yamen Wahid [1 ]
Sharkawy, R. M. [1 ]
Hamouda, M. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arab Acad Sci Technol & Maritime Transport, Elect Engn Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Univ Waterloo, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
space vector modulation; FOC-SVM; FOC-hy; DTC-hy; DTC-SVM; IM; MATLAB SIMULINK; electrical traction locomotive;
D O I
10.1109/mepcon47431.2019.9008017
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electrical traction locomotive often uses an induction motor due to the fact that it has many advantages; it has a simple construction robustness, high reliability, low maintenance cost besides it is the cheapest. This motor can be easily controlled by different techniques. This paper compares between four different types of control techniques that are used to control the motor speed. These methods are the field-oriented control using space vector modulation (FOC-SVM), the field-oriented control using hysteresis (FOC-hy), the direct torque control using hysteresis (DTC-hy) and the direct torque control using space vector modulation (DTC-SVM). MATLAB SIMULINK is used to conduct this study to show the behavior of the induction motor (IM) under these different control techniques. A comparison between the different control techniques is obtained for a train journey between two stations. The results of the study show the motor stator voltage, stator current, input and output power consumption, input and output energy, electromagnetic torque and motor speed in the time domain for the motor under study.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Highly efficient traction drive system with a normal force controller using a piezoelectric actuator
    Fukui, Rui
    Okabe, Taira
    Nakao, Masayuki
    Honda, Yukihiro
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (10):
  • [2] Synthesis of the Current Controller of the Vector Control System for Asynchronous Traction Drive of Electric Locomotives
    Goolak, Sergey
    Tkachenko, Viktor
    Sapronova, Svitlana
    Lukosevicius, Vaidas
    Kersys, Robertas
    Makaras, Rolandas
    Kersys, Arturas
    Liubarskyi, Borys
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [3] Simulating the traction drive of a locomotive in the development of an adhesion controller
    Lange, M
    GrossThebing, A
    Knothe, K
    Stiebler, M
    [J]. VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1996, 25 : 370 - 382
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Different Electrical Motor Types as a Traction Drive Part in Electrical Transmission
    Chernyshev, A. D.
    Lisovskaya, T. A.
    Lisovskiy, R. A.
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, APPLICATIONS AND MANUFACTURING (ICIEAM), 2017,
  • [5] Control system for electric traction drive
    Lehtla, M
    Laugis, J
    [J]. BEC 2004: Proceeding of the 9th Biennial Baltic Electronics Conference, 2004, : 331 - 332
  • [6] A Study on a Stepped Traction Drive Transmission
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Morikawa, Kunihiko
    Yoshitani, Kiyofumi
    Tomita, Yasushi
    Mori, Kenji
    Yamamoto, Akimitsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MECHANICAL DESIGN SYSTEMS AND MANUFACTURING, 2008, 2 (02): : 271 - 277
  • [7] Interference in Power system for traction drive with PMSM
    Dolecek, Radovan
    Cerny, Ondrej
    Novak, Jaroslav
    Bartlomiejczyk, Mikolaj
    [J]. PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2012, 88 (9A): : 204 - 207
  • [8] Inverter drive system stability for traction applications
    Shen, J
    [J]. 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2005, : 174 - 183
  • [9] LQG/LTR controller for PMSM traction system
    Zhao, Jun
    Liu, Weiguo
    Zhang, Wenjing
    [J]. Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2012, 32 (07): : 56 - 61
  • [10] Vibration suppression in a two-mass drive system using PI speed controller and additional feedbacks - Comparative study
    Szabat, Krzysztof
    Orlowska-Kowalska, Teresa
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2007, 54 (02) : 1193 - 1206