Investigation of Knowledge Management Maturity and Benchmarking Practices in Chinese Enterprises

被引:0
|
作者
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Song [1 ]
Wang, Jie [2 ]
Xia, Jinghua [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr Sustainable Dev & Global Competitiveness, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Landray Res Inst, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Knowledge Management (KM) has become widely employed as a new but promising management tool for optimizing business management and operations in China. In order for enterprises to develop a mature KM process capable of demonstrable benefits, they must assess their adoption of KM with regard to certain benchmarking practices. This paper, using a systematic approach, attempts to design and build a novel KM maturity (KMM) evaluation mechanism that combines and adapts existing models developed in the context of western management practices with new features from China's unique culture and social background. First, the key criteria are extracted via empirical analysis of the results of an extensive questionnaire, completed and returned by hundreds of Chinese enterprises in 2012. Next, based on a quantitative assessment of KMM, we further analyze the KM benchmarking practices in China. Finally, we demonstrate that KM practice in China is in a transitional stage from a content-oriented approach to a community-practice-oriented and employee-growth-oriented approach; we also observe that the Chinese enterprises with better management practices and more advanced information technology infrastructure are experimenting with integrated application-oriented KM approaches that can better foster technology and management innovations in enterprises.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1414
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking of technological innovation practices in Chinese enterprises
    Chen, J
    Xu, QR
    Yong, H
    Qu, WG
    [J]. EMS - 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY, 2000, : 52 - 56
  • [2] Knowledge management maturity model in the financial management of enterprises
    Mizla, Martin
    Jergova, Natalia
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PTS I-III, 2013, : 581 - 588
  • [3] KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT MATURITY ASPECTS IN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
    Gabris, P.
    Marettova, Bielik
    Pavlenda, P.
    Licko, M.
    Sujanova, J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DAAAM BALTIC INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 454 - 457
  • [4] Investigation on quality management maturity of Shanghai enterprises
    Shanghai Association for Quality, Shanghai Academy of Quality Management, Shanghai, China
    [J]. TQM J, 4 (417-430):
  • [5] BENCHMARKING THE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
    Kale, Serdar
    Karaman, A. Erkan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 18 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [6] Knowledge management barriers, practices and maturity model
    Oliva, Fabio Lotti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 18 (06) : 1053 - 1074
  • [7] On the use of benchmarking and good practices for knowledge management for development
    Sharma, Ravi S.
    Noorjahan, Makkati Iyoob
    Iqbal, Ahamed
    Victoriano, Monina M.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2013, 11 (04) : 346 - 360
  • [8] Knowledge Management in Small and Micro Enterprises: Applying a Maturity Model
    Oliveira, Mirian
    Pedron, Cristiane Drebes
    Nodari, Felipe
    Ribeiro, Rodolfo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2014), VOLS 1-3, 2014, : 757 - 764
  • [9] The Application of Knowledge Management in Outsourcing of Chinese Enterprises
    Ding Zhizhong
    Yu Xinning
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2008, : 366 - +
  • [10] Benchmarking Quality Management Maturity in Industry
    Makhanya, B. B. S.
    Nel, H.
    Pretorius, J. H. C.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2018, : 575 - 579