How animal agriculture stakeholders define, perceive, and are impacted by antimicrobial resistance: challenging the Wellcome Trust's Reframing Resistance principles

被引:9
|
作者
Innes, Gabriel K. [1 ]
Markos, Agnes [1 ]
Dalton, Kathryn R. [1 ]
Gould, Caitlin A. [1 ,3 ]
Nachman, Keeve E. [1 ]
Fanzo, Jessica [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Barnhill, Anne [2 ]
Frattaroli, Shannon [1 ,6 ]
Davis, Meghan F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Environm Hlth & Engn, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] John Hopkins Berman Inst Bioeth, 1809 Ashland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Environm Hlth & Engn, 1305 Delafield Pl NW, Washington, DC 20011 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Nitze Sch Adv Int Studies SAIS, Berman Inst Bioeth, 1717 Massachusetts Ave NW 730, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, 1717 Massachusetts Ave NW 730, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Antimicrobial resistance; Animal agriculture; Qualitative research; Antimicrobial use; Animal husbandry; One Health; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; FOOD ANIMALS; HEALTH; RISK; ATTITUDES; BACTERIA; FARMERS; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-021-10197-y
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Humans, animals, and the environment face a universal crisis: antimicrobial resistance (AR). Addressing AR and its multi-disciplinary causes across many sectors including in human and veterinary medicine remains underdeveloped. One barrier to AR efforts is an inconsistent process to incorporate the plenitude of stakeholders about what AR is and how to stifle its development and spread-especially stakeholders from the animal agriculture sector, one of the largest purchasers of antimicrobial drugs. In 2019, The Wellcome Trust released Reframing Resistance: How to communicate about antimicrobial resistance effectively (Reframing Resistance), which proposed the need to establish a consistent and harmonized messaging effort that describes the AR crisis and its global implications for health and wellbeing across all stakeholders. Yet, Reframing Resistance does not specifically engage the animal agriculture community. This study investigates the gap between two principles recommended by Reframing Resistance and animal agriculture stakeholders. For this analysis, the research group conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of United States animal agriculture stakeholders. Participants reported attitudes, beliefs, and practices about a variety of issues, including how they defined AR and what entities the AR crisis impacts most. Exploration of Reframing Resistance's Principle 2, "explain the fundamentals succinctly" and Principle 3, "emphasis that this is universal issue; it can affect anyone, including you" reveals disagreement in both the fundamentals of AR and consensus of "who" the AR crisis impacts. Principle 2 may do better to acknowledge that animal agriculture stakeholders espouse a complex array of perspectives that cannot be summed up in a single perspective or principle. As a primary tool to combat AR, behavior change must be accomplished first through outreach to stakeholder groups and understanding their perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 909
页数:17
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] How animal agriculture stakeholders define, perceive, and are impacted by antimicrobial resistance: challenging the Wellcome Trust’s Reframing Resistance principles
    Gabriel K. Innes
    Agnes Markos
    Kathryn R. Dalton
    Caitlin A. Gould
    Keeve E. Nachman
    Jessica Fanzo
    Anne Barnhill
    Shannon Frattaroli
    Meghan F. Davis
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2021, 38 : 893 - 909
  • [2] Science communication challenges about antimicrobial resistance in animal agriculture: insights from stakeholders
    King, Andy J.
    Wald, Dara M.
    Coberley, Denise D.
    Dahlstrom, Michael F.
    Plummer, Paul J.
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2022, 4 (02):