Limits on agency discretion to choose between rulemaking and adjudication:: Reconsidering Patel v. Ins and Ford Motor Co. v. FTC

被引：0

|

作者：

Araiza, William D.

机构：

来源：

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | 2006年 / 58卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：899 / 916

页数：18

相关论文

共 6 条

[1] Mandating Unfunded Mandates? Agency Discretion in Rulemaking After Massachusetts v. EPA
Schwentker, R. Andrew
[J]. GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2008, 76 (05) : 1444 - 1456
[2] The collateral order doctrine as applied to discovery requests - The third circuit's Kelly v. Ford Motor Co. (in re Ford Motor Co.)
Kromkowski, MA
Van Handel, JJ
[J]. NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, 1998, 73 (04) : 1119 - 1134
[3] Is the submarine patent torpedoed?: Ford Motor Co. v. Lemelson and the revival of continuation application laches
Marcus, DL
[J]. TEMPLE LAW REVIEW, 1997, 70 (02): : 521 - 586
[4] Retroactive Environmental Justice: Mingo Logan Coal Co. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Blood, Shae
[J]. ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY, 2014, 41 (02) : 589 - 595
[5] Chipping away at state tort remedies through pre-emption jurisprudence: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
Haas, AK
[J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2001, 89 (06) : 1927 - 1950
[6] Between Olga Chura, plaintiff, and Peter Ballantyne Land Holdings Company Inc., 620148 Saskatchewan Ltd., Prince Albert Casino Ventures, Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc., 621086 Saskatchewan Ltd. and Northern Lights Casino, defendants INDEXED AS: Chura v. Peter Ballantyne Land Holdings Co. Q.B. No. 118 of 2003 J.C.P.A. Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench Judicial Centre of Prince Albert JUDGES: Ryan-Froslie J. [2005] S.J. No. 617; 2005 SKQB 423; 2005 SK.C. LEXIS 754 DATE INFORMATION: Judgment: October 5, 2005. JUDGMENT DATE: October 5, 2005
Ryan-Froslie, J.
[J]. GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2005, 9 (06): : 659 - 662