Study on Anaerobic/Aerobic Membrane Bioreactor Treatment for Domestic Wastewater

被引:0
|
作者
Zhidong, L. [1 ]
Yong, Z. [1 ]
Xincheng, X. [1 ]
Lige, Z. [1 ]
Dandan, Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Municipal Design & Res Inst Environm Sci, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
submerged membrane bioreactor; anaerobic/aerobic; sludge characteristics; domestic wastewater; POLYPHOSPHATE-ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; REMOVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A 69-day experimental study was conducted to investigate the treatment process of municipal wastewater using submerged membrane bioreactor technology. The results show that the average removal rate of COD and BOD5 were over 90%. The removal rate of NH3-N was 99% and the concentration of effluent NH3-N was below 0.5mg/L; because of the high DO value in the denitration sect, the denitrobacteria was restrained and the effluent TN value was high, but the removal rate of TN can also reach 80%; the removal of TP was due to sample sludge and microorganism growth. The viscosity of sludge was not increasing with the sludge concentration, it was stabilized at 2.1 mPa.s. The sludge settling ratio (SV30) and sludge volume index (SVI) were increased because soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymers (ECP) accumulated in the reactor during the course of the experiment, mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) and mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) fell slightly The average diameter of sludge decreased in the course of the experiment, the diameter range was from 49.58 mu m to 24.96 mu m during the 69-day operation, and there was no trace of contamination membrane, illustrating that the PVDF flat sheet membrane manufactured by TORAY, Japan, had the ability to resist contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 963
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater in Tunisia
    Saddoud, Ahlem
    Ellouze, Mariem
    Dhouib, Abdelhafidh
    Sayadi, Sami
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 207 (1-3) : 205 - 215
  • [2] Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for domestic wastewater treatment
    Lew, B.
    Tarre, S.
    Beliavski, M.
    Dosoretz, C.
    Green, M.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 243 (1-3) : 251 - 257
  • [3] Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater
    Smith, Adam L.
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    Raskin, Lutgarde
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (04) : 1655 - 1665
  • [4] Scope of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor in industrial wastewater treatment
    Bhaduri, Soumyadeep
    Mazumder, Debabrata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 97 (12B) : 2771 - 2776
  • [5] Treatment of domestic wastewater with an anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor (AnCMBR)
    Yue, Xiaodi
    Koh, Yoong Keat Kelvin
    Ng, How Yong
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (12) : 2301 - 2307
  • [6] Domestic wastewater treatment using an anaerobic bioreactor coupled with membrane filtration
    Wen, C
    Huang, X
    Qian, Y
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 35 (3-4) : 335 - 340
  • [7] A microaerobic membrane bioreactor seeded with anaerobic granules for domestic wastewater treatment
    Chu, LB
    Zahng, XW
    Yang, FL
    [J]. FUTURE OF URBAN WASTEWATER SYSTEMS - DECENTRALISATION AND REUSE, 2005, : 539 - 549
  • [8] Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: A critical review
    Smith, Adam L.
    Stadler, Lauren B.
    Love, Nancy G.
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    Raskin, Lutgarde
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 122 : 149 - 159
  • [9] The brewery wastewater treatment and membrane fouling mitigation strategies in anaerobic baffled anaerobic/aerobic membrane bioreactor
    Liu, Jiadong
    Tian, Chang
    Jia, Xiaolan
    Xiong, Jingxue
    Dong, Shaonan
    Wang, Lei
    Bo, Longli
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 127 : 53 - 59
  • [10] Study of Hybrid Vertical Anaerobic Sludge-Aerobic Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment
    Phattaranawik, Jirachote
    Leiknes, TorOve
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 82 (03) : 273 - 280