Simulation Analysis of Space Debris Observation Capability of Multi-Optoelectronic Equipment

被引:3
|
作者
Hu Jingjing [1 ]
Hu Shaoming [1 ]
Liu Jing [2 ]
Chen Xu [1 ]
Du Junju [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Space Sci, Shandong Key Lab Opt Astron & Solar Terr Environm, Weihai 264209, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, China Natl Space Adm, Space Debris Monitoring & Applicat Ctr, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
detectors; optoelectronic equipment; space debris; detection capability evaluation model; observation strategies; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.3788/AOS202040.1504002
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In this study, two scanning methods arc designed by combining photoelectric detection equipment having different apertures. Further, a capability evaluation model is established for the multi-photoelectric detection equipment. The model is simulated and analyzed from the scanning mode, arrangement mode and aperture of the telescope, and the simulation results arc evaluated. The simulation results show that for the selected catalog space debris dataset, the detection results obtained via single-elevation-area scanning arc better than those obtained via multi-elevation-area scanning during the simulation time period. Under the same field of view, the number of debris detected using a combination of four 28-cm-aperture telescopes increases only by 2.4% (single-elevation-area scanning) and 3.6% (multi-elevation-area scanning) when compared with those detected using a 15-cm-aperture telescope combination. The considerably cost-effective 15-cm-aperture telescope combination must be selected to maintain a catalog of the existing space debris, and the 28-cm-aperture telescope combination must be selected for detecting small-sized space debris.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Butkus A, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE HPCMP USERS GROUP CONFERENCE 2007, P469
  • [2] Carolin F, 2011, P EUR SPAC SURV C JU
  • [3] Covariance study to evaluate the influence of optical follow-up strategies on estimated orbital parameters
    Cordelli, E.
    Vananti, A.
    Schildknecht, T.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 122 : 76 - 89
  • [4] DAI L, 2014, INFRARED LASER ENG, V43, P219
  • [5] Donath T, 2005, ESA SP PUBL, V587, P31
  • [6] Possible European systems for space situational awareness
    Donath, Th.
    Schildknecht, T.
    Martinot, V.
    Del Monte, L.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2010, 66 (9-10) : 1378 - 1387
  • [7] Proposed strategies for optical observations in a future European Space Surveillance network
    Flohrer, T.
    Schildknecht, T.
    Musci, R.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2008, 41 (07) : 1010 - 1021
  • [8] Performance estimation for GEO space surveillance
    Flohrer, T
    Schildknecht, T
    Musci, R
    Stöveken, E
    [J]. SPACE DEBRIS, 2005, 35 (07): : 1226 - 1235
  • [9] Hinze A, 2017, P 7 EUR C SPAC DEBR
  • [10] Hu J., 2016, ACTA PHOTONICA SINIC, V45