Identifying systemically important financial institutions in Turkey

被引:15
|
作者
Caliskan, Hande [1 ]
Cevik, Emrah I. [1 ]
Cevik, Nuket Kirci [1 ]
Dibooglu, Sel [2 ]
机构
[1] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Tekirdag, Turkey
[2] Univ Sharjah, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Systemic risk; Financial system; Component expected shortfall; Turkish economy; CAPITAL SHORTFALL; RISK; RETURN; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101374
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the systemic risk of financial firms in Turkey. Using Component Expected Shortfall, we provide estimates of systemic risk in Turkey using daily data from 2005 to 2018 and a comprehensive data set encompassing 54 financial firms. Empirical results show that the preponderance of systemic risk in the sample in Turkey is due to large commercial banks. Top ten systemically important financial institutions dominate systemic risk measures in Turkey and account for more than 90 % of total risk over the sample. Consequently, the risk in the Turkish financial system is concentrated in specific financial institutions and makes close monitoring of the top firms essential. Historical incidence of systemic risk in the sample shows elevated levels of systemic risk correspond to well-known external events. Finally, a bivariate VAR model shows that systemic risk is correlated with measures of global financial risks and has significant negative effects on the real economy particularly on industrial production. This is important from a financial stability point of view in that close monitoring of the systemic risk is important in maintaining a healthy financial system and a well- functioning market economy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying and Regulating Systemically Important Financial Institutions
    Bongini, Paola
    Nieri, Laura
    [J]. ECONOMIC NOTES, 2014, 43 (01) : 39 - 62
  • [2] Identifying systemically important financial institutions: a network approach
    Kaltwasser, Pablo Rovira
    Spelta, Alessandro
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (1-2) : 155 - 185
  • [3] Identifying systemically important financial institutions: a network approach
    Pablo Rovira Kaltwasser
    Alessandro Spelta
    [J]. Computational Management Science, 2019, 16 : 155 - 185
  • [4] The analytical framework for identifying and benchmarking systemically important financial institutions in Europe
    Karkowska, Renata
    [J]. PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2014, 12 (04): : 25 - 40
  • [5] Taming Systemically Important Financial Institutions
    Freixas, Xavier
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2013, 45 : 37 - 58
  • [6] The intrafirm complexity of systemically important financial institutions
    Lumsdaine, R. L.
    Rockmore, D. N.
    Foti, N. J.
    Leibon, G.
    Farmer, J. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 52
  • [7] The importance of being systemically important financial institutions
    Bongini, Paola
    Nieri, Laura
    Pelagatti, Matteo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 50 : 562 - 574
  • [8] Resolving Systemically Important Financial Institutions and Markets
    Ketessidis, Adam
    [J]. NEW INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM: ANALYZING THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF REGULATORY REFORM, 2016, 48 : 307 - 314
  • [9] Measuring and testing for the systemically important financial institutions
    Castro, Carlos
    Ferrari, Stijn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2014, 25 : 1 - 14
  • [10] Bondholder reorganization of systemically important financial institutions
    Gjerstad, Steven D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2018, 10 (02) : 281 - 289