Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Influenza A (H1N1) Chemoprophylaxis in Brazil

被引:3
|
作者
Vecoso, Luisa von Zuben [1 ]
Silva, Marcus Tolentino [2 ]
Resende, Mariangela Ribeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Everton Nunes [3 ]
Galvao, Tais Freire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
cost-effectiveness; cost-utility; neuraminidase inhibitor; prophylaxis; influenza; Brazil; Unified Health System; POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; OSELTAMIVIR; ADULTS; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY; GUIDANCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2019.00945
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Oseltamivir and zanamivir are recommended for treating and preventing influenza A (H1N1) worldwide. In Brazil, this official recommendation lacks an economic evaluation. Our objective was to assess the efficiency of influenza A chemoprophylaxis in the Brazilian context. Methods: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir for prophylaxis of influenza for high risk population, compared to no prophylaxis, in the perspective of Brazilian public health system. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and effectiveness data were based on literature review and costs in Brazilian real (BRL) were estimated from official sources and micro-costing of 2016's H1N1 admissions at a university hospital. We used a decision-tree model considering prophylaxis and no prophylaxis and the probabilities of H1N1, ambulatory care, admission to hospital, intensive care, patient discharge, and death. Adherence and adverse events from prophylaxis were included. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was converted to 2016 United States dollar (USD). Uncertainty was assessed with univariated and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Adherence to prophylaxis was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54; 0.83]; adverse events, 0.09 (95% CI 0.02; 0.18); relative risk of H1N1 infection in chemoprophylaxis, 0.43 (95% CI 0.33; 0.57); incidence of H1N1, 0.14 (95% CI 0.11; 0.16); ambulatory care, 0.67 (95% CI 0.58; 0.75); hospital admission, 0.43 (CI 95% 0.39; 0.42); hospital mortality, 0.14 (CI 95% 0.12; 0.15); intensive care unit admission, 0.23 (95% CI 0.20; 0.27); and intensive care mortality, 0.40 (95% CI 0.29; 0.52). QALY in H1N1 state was 0.50 (95% CI 0.46; 0.53); in H1N1 inpatients, 0.23 (95% CI 0.18; 0.28); healthy, 0.885 (95% CI 0.879; 0.891); death, 0. Adverse events estimated to affect QALY in -0.185 (95% CI -0.290; -0.050). Cost for chemoprophylaxis was BRL 39.42 [standard deviation (SD) 17.94]; ambulatory care, BRL 12.47 (SD 5.21); hospital admission, BRL 5,727.59 (SD 7,758.28); intensive care admission, BRL 19,217.25 (SD 7,917.33); and adverse events, BRL 292.05 (SD 724.95). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was BRL -4,080.63 (USD -1,263.74)/QALY and -982.39 (USD -304.24)/H1N1 prevented. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Chemoprophylaxis of influenza A (H1N1) is cost-saving in Brazilian health system context.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination Against Pandemic Influenza (H1N1) 2009
    Khazeni, Nayer
    Hutton, David W.
    Garber, Alan M.
    Hupert, Nathaniel
    Owens, Douglas K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (12) : 829 - U2
  • [2] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF 2009 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA A(H1N1) VACCINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
    Prosser, L. A.
    Lavelle, T. A.
    Fiore, A.
    Bridges, C. B.
    Reed, C.
    Jain, S.
    Dunham, K.
    Meltzer, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A192 - A192
  • [3] Cost-Effectiveness of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Vaccination in the United States
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Lavelle, Tara A.
    Fiore, Anthony E.
    Bridges, Carolyn B.
    Reed, Carrie
    Jain, Seema
    Dunham, Kelly M.
    Meltzer, Martin I.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07):
  • [4] Value for Money in H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Pandemic Interventions
    Pasquini-Descomps, Helene
    Brender, Nathalie
    Maradan, David
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (06) : 819 - 827
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness in the detection of influenza H1N1: clinical data versus rapid tests
    Gonzalez-Canudas, Jorge
    Maria Iglesias-Chiesa, Jimena
    Romero-Antonio, Yulia
    Chavez-Cortes, Carolina
    Gabriel Gay-Molina, Juan
    Rivas-Ruiz, Rodolfo
    [J]. REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 29 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [6] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF VACCINATION AND SELF-ISOLATION IN CASE OF H1N1
    Yarmand, Hamed
    Ivy, Julie S.
    Roberts, Stephen D.
    Bengtson, Mary W.
    Bengtson, Neal M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, 2010, : 2199 - 2210
  • [7] TOLERANCE OF OSELTAMIVIR FOR CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS OF INFLUENZA A (H1N1) INFECTION IN NEONATES
    Leick, C.
    Hays, S.
    Perpoint, T.
    Boibieux, A.
    Picaud, J. -C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 697 - 697
  • [8] H1N1 Influenza Analysis
    Stephenson, Joan
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (23): : 2432 - 2432
  • [9] The Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in Southern Brazil
    Carneiro, Marcelo
    Bercini, Marilina Assunta
    Lara, Beanir da Silva
    Gregianini, Tatiana Schaeffer
    Machado, Janete Aparecida
    Krummenauer, Eliane Carlosso
    Adam, Mariana Schmidt
    Kuplich, Nadia
    Moura Valim, Andreia Rosane
    Michelim, Lessandra
    Pedro, Fabio Lopes
    Pina Trench, Flavia Juliana
    Waib, Luis Fernando
    Possuelo, Lia Goncalves
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (12): : 1235 - 1237
  • [10] Analysis of partial cost with vaccine for prevention of Influenza A (H1N1)
    de Oliveira, Edmilson
    Bellucci Jonior, Jose Aparecido
    Inoue, Kelly Cristina
    Matsuda, Laura Misue
    [J]. VIGILANCIA SANITARIA EM DEBATE-SOCIEDADE CIENCIA & TECNOLOGIA, 2014, 2 (02): : 53 - 59