Calibration of the disk diffusion test for trovafloxacin susceptibility testing of four anaerobic species

被引:8
|
作者
Kronvall, G
Holst, E
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med, Div Clin Microbiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
antibiotic susceptibility testing; disk diffusion test; calibration; regression line; interpretive zone breakpoint; trovafloxacin susceptibility; quality control;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00031.x
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives To study troxafloxacin susceptibility among clinical isolates of four anaerobic bacterial species using minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) determinations, E test assays and disk diffusion test results and to calibrate the disk diffusion method for these species using single strain regression analysis (SRA). Methods One-hundred and eighty-seven clinical isolates of four anaerobic bacterial species were included. Trovafloxacin MIC determinations were performed using the agar dilution technique and MIC estimations using the E test. The disk diffusion test was performed according to Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics standardization NCCLS limits for susceptibility categories were applied. SRA was performed using 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 mu g trovafloxacin disk contents and ATCC control strains. The regression lines obtained permitted the calculation of zone equivalents to MIC limits as well as an evaluation of various disk potencies. Results Trovafloxacin susceptibility (S + I) was noted in 98.9, 100, 100, and 97% of Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Clostridium perfringens, and Peptostreptococcus magnus strains, respectively, as judged by MIC determinations, Agar dilution and E test estimations gave the same results, but E test values were consistently lower than MIC values by the reference method. Regression lines calculated for the four species using SRA showed different equation constants indicating species-related differences. Interpretive zone diameter breakpoints were calculated for the four species and used for the interpretation of susceptibility. Conclusions The disk diffusion test was successfully calibrated for trovafloxacin susceptibility testing of four anaerobic species using single strain regression analysis, SRA. There was a good agreement between the results of MIC-tests and disk testing. Interpretive errors of type I are prone to occur among Bacteroides isolates and might require species-related MIC limits. SRA calculations permitted the testing of the effect of different disk potencies on inhibition zones produced at the interpretive MIC limits. Criteria for the selection of a minimal disk content showed that 5 mu g trovafloxacin is sufficient, but a 10 mu g disk will safeguard against residual laboratory variation without producing too large inhibition zones for very susceptible strains.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calibration of disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing:: Species-related trovafloxacin interpretive zone breakpoints and selection of disk potency
    Kronvall, G
    Rylander, M
    Walder, M
    Lind-Brandberg, L
    Larsson, P
    Törnqvist, E
    Monsen, T
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 31 (06) : 573 - 578
  • [2] DISK DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF NOCARDIA SPECIES
    WALLACE, RJ
    SEPTIMUS, EJ
    MUSHER, DM
    MARTIN, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1977, 135 (04): : 568 - 576
  • [3] Fluconazole disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Candida species
    Kirkpatrick, WR
    Turner, TM
    Fothergill, AW
    McCarthy, DI
    Redding, SW
    Rinaldi, MG
    Patterson, TF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (11) : 3429 - 3432
  • [4] In vitro activity and selection of disk content for disk diffusion susceptibility tests with trovafloxacin
    Fuchs, PC
    Barry, AL
    Brown, SD
    Sewell, DL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 15 (08) : 678 - 682
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVE ANAEROBIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING BY AGAR DISK DIFFUSION
    STRONGIN, W
    SACEANU, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1985, 83 (03) : 398 - 398
  • [6] Calibration of fusidic acid disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus
    Olsson-Liljequist, B
    Köljalg, S
    Karlsson, I
    Kronvall, G
    [J]. APMIS, 2002, 110 (10) : 690 - 696
  • [7] Comparative Evaluation of E-Test and Disk Diffusion Methods for Susceptibility Testing of Nocardia Species
    Percin, Duygu
    Sumerkan, Bulent
    Inci, Ramazan
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (02): : 274 - 279
  • [8] Comparison of disk diffusion test and etest for voriconazole and fluconazole susceptibility testing
    Buchita, V.
    Vejsova, M.
    Vale-Silva, L. A.
    [J]. FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 2008, 53 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [9] DIFFUSION DISK SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING WITH CEFOTAXIME
    ASWAPOKEE, N
    ASWAPOKEE, P
    NEU, HC
    FU, KP
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1979, 16 (02) : 164 - 166
  • [10] RELIABILITY OF DISK DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING
    MURRAY, PR
    ZEITINGER, JR
    KROGSTAD, DJ
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 3 (03): : 230 - &